Having decided that you need to subnetwork your IP network number, how do you go about it? The following is an overview of the steps which will then be explained in detail:-
For the purpose of this example, we will assume we are sub-networking a single C class network number: 192.168.1.0
This provides for a maximum of 254 connected interfaces (hosts), plus the obligatory network number (192.168.1.0) and broadcast address (192.168.1.255).
You will need to install the correct cabling infrastructure for all the devices you wish to interconnect designed to meet your physical layout.
You will also need a mechanism to interconnect the various segments together (routers, media converters etc.).
A detailed discussion of this is obviously impossible here. Should you need help, there are network design/installation consultants around who provide this sort of service. Free advice is also available on a number of Usenet news groups (such as comp.os.linux.networking).
There is a play off between the number of subnetworks you create and 'wasted' IP numbers.
Every individual IP network has two addresses unusable as interface (host) addresses - the network IP number itself and the broadcast address. When you subnetwork, each subnetwork requires its own, unique IP network number and broadcast address - and these have to be valid addresses from within the range provided by the IP network that you are sub-networking.
So, by sub-networking an IP network into two separate subnetworks, there are now two network addresses and two broadcast addresses - increasing the 'unusable' interface (host) addresses; creating 4 subnetworks creates eight unusable interface (host) addresses and so on.
In fact the smallest usable subnetwork consists of 4 IP numbers:-
Quite why one would want to create such a small network is another question! With only a single host on the network, any network communication must go out to another network. However, the example does serve to show the law of diminishing returns that applies to sub-networking.
In principle, you can only divide your IP network number into 2^n (where n is one less that the number of host bits in your IP network number) equally sized subnetworks (you can subnetwork a subnetwork and combine subnetworks however).
So be realistic about designing your network design - you want the minimum number of separate local networks that is consistent with management, physical, equipment and security constraints!
The network mask is what performs all the local magic of dividing an IP network into subnetworks.
The network mask for an un-sub-networked IP network number is simply a dotted quad which has all the 'network bits' of the network number set to '1' and all the host bits set to '0'.
So, for the three classes of IP networks, the standard network masks are:-
The way sub-networking operates is to borrow one or more of the available host bits and make then make interfaces locally interpret these borrowed bits as part of the network bits. So to divide a network number into two subnetworks, we would borrow one host bit by setting the appropriate bit in the network mask of the first (normal) host bit to '1'.
For a C Class address, this would result in a netmask of
11111111.11111111.11111111.10000000
or 255.255.255.128
For our C Class network number of 192.168.1.0, these are some of the sub-networking options you have:-
No of No of subnets Hosts/net netmask 2 126 255.255.255.128 (11111111.11111111.11111111.10000000) 4 62 255.255.255.192 (11111111.11111111.11111111.11000000) 8 30 255.255.255.224 (11111111.11111111.11111111.11100000) 16 14 255.255.255.240 (11111111.11111111.11111111.11110000) 32 6 255.255.255.248 (11111111.11111111.11111111.11111000) 64 2 255.255.255.252 (11111111.11111111.11111111.11111100)
In principle, there is absolutely no reason to follow the above way of subnetworking where network mask bits are added from the most significant host bit to the least significant host bit. However, if you do not do it this way, the resulting IP numbers will be in a very odd sequence! This makes it extremely difficult for us humans to decide to which subnetwork an IP number belongs as we are not too good at thinking in binary (computers on the other hand are and will use whatever scheme you tell them with equal equanimity).
Having decided on the appropriate netmask, you then need to work out what the various Network and broadcast addresses are - and the IP number range for each of these networks. Again, considering only a C Class IP Network number and listing only the final (host part) we have:-
Netmask Subnets Network B'cast MinIP MaxIP Hosts Total Hosts
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
128 2 0 127 1 126 126
128 255 129 254 126 252
192 4 0 63 1 62 62
64 127 65 126 62
128 191 129 190 62
192 255 193 254 62 248
224 8 0 31 1 30 30
32 63 33 62 30
64 95 65 94 30
96 127 97 126 30
128 159 129 158 30
160 191 161 190 30
192 223 193 222 30
224 255 225 254 30 240
As can be seen, there is a very definite sequence to these numbers, which make them fairly easy to check. The 'downside' of sub-networking is also visible in terms of the reducing total number of available host addresses as the number of subnetworks increases.
With this information, you are now in a position to assign host and network IP numbers and netmasks.