Type Variable (Z2 and
Z3)This vignette demonstrates the standard workflow for
comparing two or more groups when the input datasets
include a Type variable. Other vignettes
describe the workflows for single-group analyses and for multi-group
comparisons without a Type variable.
Starting from datasets containing observed frequencies for multiple groups and types, the workflow prepares each dataset, fits discrete power-law models for each group–type combination, computes the Relative Importance Factor (RIF), and generates publication-ready comparative tables and visualizations.
Most users will only need the high-level workflow functions described in this vignette. The Advanced usage section introduces lower-level functions for users who require additional customization.
The methods implemented in the
RIFanalysis package are based on the
following publication:
The complete analysis is organized into three main stages. First,
each input dataset is standardized independently using
rif_prepare(), preserving the categories
defined by its Type variable. Next,
rif_workflow_z2() fits the discrete
power-law models and computes the RIF measures for the group–type
combinations, producing the comparative RIF results. Finally,
rif_workflow_z3() generates
publication-ready visualizations from the combined results.
Group 1 dataset Group 2 dataset
(multiple types) (multiple types)
┌────────┐ ┌────────┐
│ Type A │ │ Type A │
│ Type B │ │ Type B │
│ Type C │ │ Type C │
└────┬───┘ └────┬───┘
│ │
▼ ▼
rif_prepare() rif_prepare()
│ │
└────────────┬───────────┘
▼
rif_workflow_z2()
│
Group × Type comparisons
│
▼
rif_workflow_z3()
│
┌───────────────────┼───────────────────┐
▼ ▼ ▼
RIF matrices RIF networks Publication-ready figures
The workflow consists of the following steps:
Define user-specific objects and input parameters.
Import and prepare the datasets.
Fit discrete power-law models for each group and type.
Compute group-specific and comparative RIF measures.
Generate comparative tables and graphical outputs.
Export results to Excel and image files.
Because the datasets used in this vignette do not contain a
Group variable, the objects
gr_value_name1 and
gr_value_name2 define group labels that
are assigned during data preparation through the
group_value argument of
rif_prepare().
In contrast, the datasets already contain a
Type variable. Therefore,
var_type_name1 and
var_type_name2 identify the corresponding
columns in the original datasets through the
type_col argument.
# Review required variable names (ALWAYS verify them in the dataset)
fact_lbl_prefix1 <- "gr1T" # Choose according to your needs (gr=group, T=topic, C=concept, F=factor, I=index, etc.)
var_factor_name1 <- "factor1" # Long/original FACTOR variable
var_factor_small1 <- "factor_small1" # Short FACTOR variable
var_factor_label_small1 <- "factor_label_small1" # FACTOR_label_small variable
var_count_name1 <- "count1" # COUNT variable
fact_lbl_prefix2 <- "gr2T" # Choose according to your needs (gr=group, T=topic, C=concept, F=factor, I=index, etc.)
var_factor_name2 <- "factor2" # Long/original FACTOR variable
var_factor_small2 <- "factor_small2" # Short FACTOR variable
var_factor_label_small2 <- "factor_label_small2" # FACTOR_label_small variable
var_count_name2 <- "count2" # COUNT variable
# Identify the Type column available in each input dataset
var_type_name1 <- "type1" # Change
var_type_name2 <- "type2" # Change
# Assign labels identifying the groups to be compared because the datasets do not contain a Group variable
gr_value_name1 <- "gr1_NAME" # Change (Colombia, Greece, Blue Economy, etc.)
gr_value_name2 <- "gr2_NAME" # Change (Colombia, Greece, Blue Economy, etc.)
#prefix_name <- paste0(gr_name, "_")
#________________________________________________________________________
#
# If desired, change axis title for RIF matrices (Topic, Concept, Factor, etc.) and labels.
# IN rif_workflow_z3, SEE plot_matrix.R FUNCTION:
# Axis title:
x_title_name <- "s: CHANGE_NAME at rank s" # default: Concept
y_title_name <- "r: CHANGE_NAME at rank r" # default: Concept
# Axis labels:
factor_r_label_col_name <- "Factor_label" # default: factor_r_label_col = NULL
factor_s_label_col_name <- "Factor_label" # default: factor_s_label_col = NULL
#________________________________________________________________________
#
# Change titles for power-law plots (used in rif__workflow_z1 and plot_zipf)
#title default is "Observed and theoretical Zipf distributions..."
title_plotzipf_gr1_c2 <- "GROUPNAME1" # Change if desired
title_plotzipf_gr2_c2 <- "GROUPNAME2" # Change if desired
x_title_plotzipf_c2 <- "Position" # Change if desired (default="Rank")
y_title_plotzipf_c2 <- "Frequency" # Change if desired (default="Count")
#________________________________________________________________________
#
# Change custom file names (if desired)
file_prefix_no_title <- "zipf_notitle"
file_prefix_yes_title_c1 <- "zipf_yestitle_c1"
file_prefix_yes_title_c2 <- "zipf_yestitle_c2"
# Change output directories (if desired)
output_dir_personal <- file.path(tempdir(), "Z0_personal")
output_dir_comparison <- file.path(tempdir(), "Z2_RIF_comparison")
output_dir_visual <- file.path(tempdir(), "Z3_RIF_visual")Each dataset must be prepared independently before running the
comparative workflow. The rif_prepare()
function validates the input data, assigns Zipf ranks, and creates the
standardized tables required by
rif_workflow_z2().
The resulting objects, rif_data1 and
rif_data2, represent the prepared datasets
for Groups 1 and 2, respectively.
rif_data1 <- rif_prepare(data= data_gr1,
factor_col = var_factor_name1,
count_col = var_count_name1,
factor_small_col = var_factor_small1,
group_col = NULL,
type_col = var_type_name1,
group_value = gr_value_name1,
type_value = var_type_value_name1,
prefix = fact_lbl_prefix1,
factor_small_label_style = "inline")
rif_data1
names(rif_data1)rif_data2 <- rif_prepare(data= data_gr2,
factor_col = var_factor_name2,
count_col = var_count_name2,
factor_small_col = var_factor_small2,
group_col = NULL,
type_col = var_type_name2,
group_value = gr_value_name2,
type_value = var_type_value_name2,
prefix = fact_lbl_prefix2,
factor_small_label_style = "inline")
rif_data2
names(rif_data2)The comparative workflow is executed with
rif_workflow_z2(). This function fits
discrete power-law models for the group–type combinations represented in
the prepared datasets, computes the corresponding RIF measures,
constructs the comparative RIF results, generates diagnostic plots, and
exports the resulting tables and figures.
z2 <- rif_workflow_z2(
rif_data1= rif_data1,
rif_data2= rif_data2,
alpha_zipf = 1,
no_of_sims = 1000,
threads = 8,
seed = 123,
bootstrap_engine = "poweRlaw",
output_dir = output_dir_comparison,
plot_formats = c("png", "pdf")
)The workflow returns a single object containing both the individual analyses for each group and the combined comparative results. The table below summarizes its most important components.
| Component | Description |
|---|---|
input1, input2 |
Original input objects for Groups 1 and 2. |
data1, data2 |
Prepared datasets preserving the Type
categories. |
zipf1, zipf2 |
Descriptive Zipf tables by group and type. |
analysis1, analysis2 |
Power-law estimation results for the group–type combinations. |
rif_results1,
rif_results2 |
Group-specific RIF results stratified by type. |
rif_comparison |
Combined object containing the group-by-type comparative RIF results. |
plots |
Group- and type-specific plots generated by the workflow. |
files |
Paths to exported Excel files and graphical outputs. |
The objects returned by
rif_workflow_z2() have the same overall
structure as those described in Vignette 2: Multi-Group
Comparison. When a Type variable
is present, the corresponding tables, analyses, plots, and exported
files are internally organized by type.
The following commands illustrate how to access the principal components.
# Original input objects
z2$input1
z2$input2
# Input object classes
z2$input_class1
z2$input_class2
# Prepared datasets
z2$data1
z2$data2
# Descriptive Zipf tables
z2$zipf1
z2$zipf2
# Power-law analysis (`plreg`) objects
z2$analysis1
z2$analysis2
# RIF result objects
z2$rif_results1
z2$rif_results2
# Comparative RIF results
z2$rif_comparison
# Generated plots
z2$plots
# Exported files and directories
z2$filesThe rif_workflow_z3() function
generates publication-ready comparative visualizations from
z2$rif_comparison. In this example, the
combined results are used to create RIF matrices and networks
representing relationships across the analyzed groups.
rif_workflow_z3(
x = z2$rif_comparison,
scope = "combined",
plot_types = c("matrix", "network"),
formats = c("png", "pdf"),
#plot_types = "matrix",
output_dir = output_dir_visual,
#SEE plot_matrix.R FUNCTION:
matrix_args = list(
#factor_r_label_col = factor_r_label_col_name,
factor_s_label_col = factor_s_label_col_name,
x_title = x_title_name,
y_title = y_title_name
)
)Most low-level functions used in this workflow are identical to those described in Vignette 1: Single-Group Analysis and Vignette 2: Multi-Group Comparison. For this reason, they are not repeated here.
This section presents only the objects and functions that are
specific to the multi-group and multi-type comparison implemented in
rif_workflow_z2().