---
title: "Prior Sensitivity and Simulation-Based Recovery"
output: rmarkdown::html_vignette
vignette: >
  %\VignetteIndexEntry{Prior Sensitivity and Simulation-Based Recovery}
  %\VignetteEngine{knitr::rmarkdown}
  %\VignetteEncoding{UTF-8}
---

```{r setup, include=FALSE}
knitr::opts_chunk$set(
  collapse = TRUE,
  comment = "#>"
)
```

## Different validation questions

Prior sensitivity and parameter recovery answer different questions.

Prior sensitivity asks whether selected posterior summaries change materially
under prespecified defensible prior-scale changes.

Recovery asks whether the complete simulation, preparation, specification,
fitting, and summarization workflow can recover known generating values under a
declared synthetic design.

Neither procedure proves that a model is appropriate for every empirical data
set.

## Prior-scale sensitivity

Binary and duration sensitivity functions refit the same approved formula,
likelihood, backend, and sampling algorithm. Only declared prior scales are
multiplied.

```{r binary-sensitivity, eval=FALSE}
binary_sensitivity <- assess_binary_prior_sensitivity(
  binary_fit,
  scale_multipliers = c(
    tighter = 0.5,
    wider = 2
  ),
  maximum_standardized_shift = 0.25,
  review_standardized_shift = 0.50
)

binary_sensitivity
binary_sensitivity$comparison
```

```{r duration-sensitivity, eval=FALSE}
duration_sensitivity <- assess_duration_prior_sensitivity(
  duration_fit,
  scale_multipliers = c(
    tighter = 0.5,
    wider = 2
  )
)
```

The standardized shift is the absolute change in posterior median divided by
the reference posterior standard deviation. A pass applies only to the
declared multipliers. The object always records `robustness_claim = FALSE`.

## Simulation-based recovery

The recovery functions repeatedly:

1. generate deterministic synthetic data with stored truth;
2. create the approved model contract;
3. prepare and audit the data;
4. specify the approved priors;
5. fit through `brms` and `rstan`;
6. run the sampling diagnostic contract;
7. calculate bias, RMSE, interval coverage, and interval width.

```{r binary-recovery, eval=FALSE}
binary_recovery <- run_binary_recovery(
  repetitions = 20,
  n_participants = 30,
  trials_per_participant = 16,
  seed = 5001
)
```

```{r duration-recovery, eval=FALSE}
duration_recovery <- run_duration_recovery(
  repetitions = 20,
  n_participants = 30,
  trials_per_participant = 16,
  baseline_median = 500,
  outcome_unit = "milliseconds",
  seed = 6001
)
```

## Minimum repetition rule

The default reporting contract requires at least 20 completed repetitions
before an overall recovery pass is possible. A smaller run can detect obvious
software or workflow failures, but its best possible status is `review`.

This rule prevents a two- or five-repetition smoke test from being described as
validation.

## Failure handling

With `continue_on_error = TRUE`, a failed repetition is retained in the
fit-status registry. It is not silently removed from the denominator. Repeated
fitting failures lower the diagnostic pass fraction and can force review or
failure.

## Interpretation

Recovery is conditional on:

- the selected data-generating parameters;
- sample size and grouping structure;
- the approved prior specification;
- the chosen MCMC settings;
- the interval probability;
- the declared recovery thresholds.

A successful recovery experiment is evidence about that design. It is not a
universal guarantee of unbiased inference, causal identification, or
substantive validity.
