Internet-Draft | Oblivious Proxy Feedback | May 2022 |
Reddy, et al. | Expires 24 November 2022 | [Page] |
To provide equitable service to clients, servers often rate-limit incoming requests, for example, based upon the source IP address. However, oblivious HTTP removes the ability for the server to distinguish amongst clients so the server can only rate-limit traffic from the oblivious proxy. This harms all clients behind that oblivious proxy.¶
This specification enables a server to convey rate-limit information to an oblivious proxy, which can use it to apply rate-limit policies on oblivious clients. Cooperating oblivious proxies can thus provide more equitable service to their distinguishable clients without impacting on all clients behind that oblivious proxy.¶
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.¶
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.¶
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."¶
This Internet-Draft will expire on 24 November 2022.¶
Copyright (c) 2022 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.¶
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License.¶
Oblivious HTTP [OHTTP] requires three parties to exchange HTTP messages: the client, the proxy, and the target (formally, the Oblivious Request Resource and Oblivious Target Resource). Oblivious HTTP enables a client to send requests to a target in such a way that the target cannot tell whether two requests came from the same client, and the proxy cannot see the contents of the requests.¶
Since oblivious clients are located behind a proxy, a target cannot distinguish between well-behaving and malicious clients: an unexpected behavior from one or more clients can then impact on all the intermediated clients, as described in Section 8.2.1 of [OHTTP]. This can be problematic when the target implements rate limiting policies based on an information masked by the intermediary, such as the source IP address.¶
This document defines a mechanism that allows Oblivious request and target resource to provide rate-limit information to an Oblivious proxy via the RateLimit fields defined in [RATELIMIT]. This is useful when such servers identify traffic anomalies or unexpected request volumes. The Oblivious proxy can then use this information to apply rate-limit policies on oblivious clients.¶
While [RATELIMIT] provides enough information to generic clients to shape their request policy and avoid being throttled out, this specification allows an Oblivious request and target resource to indicate their RateLimit information is intended for the Oblivious proxy (rather than to the client).¶
How an Oblivious proxy can use this information to avoid being throttled out or shape its request policy is outside the scope of this specification.¶
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119][RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.¶
The terms "content", "receiver", "request", and "response" are to be interpreted as described in [HTTP].¶
The terms "Encapsulated request", "Encapsulated response", "Oblivious proxy resource", "Oblivious request resource", "Oblivious target resource", and "Client" are to be interpreted as described in [OHTTP].¶
The collective term "Oblivious resource" indicates either an "Oblivious request resource" or an "Oblivious target resource".¶
The terms "quota policy", "service limit", "expiring limit", and "RateLimit fields" are to be interpreted as described in [RATELIMIT].¶
This document uses the Integer type from [STRUCTURED-FIELDS].¶
An Oblivious resource that uses RateLimit fields [RATELIMIT] to return service limit information MAY add the "ohttp-target" quota policy parameter defined in Section 4 to signal to the receiver that the associated quota policy is intended for an Oblivious proxy. For example, when an Oblivious target identifies a high frequency or high volume anomalies in the HTTP requests it would include the "ohttp-target" parameter.¶
The term "Oblivious Proxy Feedback" denotes both the mechanism described in this specification and the complete set of RateLimit fields together with the "ohttp-target" parameter.¶
To know whether the RateLimit fields provides Oblivious Proxy Feedback (see Section 3.1), an Oblivious proxy MUST:¶
In the example shown in Figure 1, the expiring limit value is "100", so the associated quota policy is the second one. This quota policy includes the "ohttp-target" parameter: this indicates that the RateLimit fields are intended for an Oblivious proxy.¶
The following quota policy parameter is defined for the RateLimit-Limit field [RATELIMIT]:¶
The "ohttp-target" parameter has the following syntax:¶
ohttp-target = sf-integer¶
Its value MUST be an Integer (Section 3.3.1 of [STRUCTURED-FIELDS]) and indicates whether the quota policy is applicable to all the clients that are serviced by the Oblivious proxy or applicable only to a specific client. The "ohttp-target" parameter MUST have one of the following values:¶
Other values MUST cause the parameter to be ignored.¶
The "ohttp-target" parameter MUST NOT appear more than once in a quota policy. If the parameter is malformed or its value is invalid, it MUST be ignored, and the receiving Oblivious proxy MUST NOT attempt to fix neither the parameter nor its value. That is, the RateLimit fields must not be considered as providing Oblivious Proxy Feedback.¶
An Oblivious proxy receiving RateLimit fields providing Oblivious Proxy Feedback will do the following:¶
An Oblivious request resource receiving RateLimit fields providing Oblivious Proxy Feedback will do the following:¶
If the RateLimit fields along with the "ohttp-target" parameter are generated by the oblivious request resource before removing the protection (including being unable to remove the encapsulation for any reason)(Section 6.2 of [OHTTP]), it will result in the RateLimit fields added in the response being sent without protection in response to a POST request from a client.¶
While this specification does not mandate specific traffic shaping actions for Oblivious proxies in addition to the ones indicated in [RATELIMIT], an Oblivious proxy failing to reshape traffic from a specific client or from all the clients according to the received Oblivious Proxy Feedback can experience different levels of service denial by the Oblivious request and target resources. There is no explicit mechanism for an Oblivious proxy to indicate to the server that the rate-limit information was processed or was ignored.¶
The following quota policy parameter is defined for the RateLimit-Limit field defined in [RATELIMIT]:¶
attack-severity = sf-string¶
Note that sf-string is defined in Section 3.3.3 of [STRUCTURED-FIELDS].¶
The value of the "attack-severity" parameter is a String (Section 3.3.3 of [RFC8941]) that takes one of the values defined in [SEVERITY]. This parameter MUST NOT appear more than once in a quota policy. If the parameter is malformed or its value is invalid, the parameter MUST be ignored, and the proxies MUST NOT attempt to fix neither the parameter nor the value.¶
The example depicted in Figure 2 illustrates the use of the "ohttp-target" parameter. An oblivious target resource receives a malformed message and uses the source IP address to identify that it was an oblivious HTTP request decapsulated by an oblivious request resource. The Oblivious target resource generates a 400 response and adds the RateLimit fields along with the "ohttp-target" quota policy parameter. The oblivious request resource proceeds as follows:¶
The response that is generated by the Oblivious request resource is depicted in Figure 3. This response includes an unregistered, informative "comment" quota policy parameter providing the rationale for the "attack- severity".¶
The security considerations for the Oblivious HTTP protocol (Section 8 of [OHTTP]) as well as the ones for RateLimit-Limit fields (Section 6 of [RATELIMIT]) apply. The following sub-sections discuss security considerations specific to this specification.¶
While Oblivious HTTP relies upon an Oblivious proxy to prevent leaking the client identity to the Oblivious resources, it might be the case that the Oblivious proxy colludes with clients in attacking Oblivious resources. RateLimit fields might disclose operational capacity information useful to design denial of service attacks or to circumvent defensive measures put in place by the Oblivious resources (Section 6.2 of [RATELIMIT]). The Oblivious target and request resources SHOULD convey Oblivious Proxy Feedback only to trusted Oblivious proxies.¶
Attacks against the Oblivious Request and Target Resources can be classified into three primary categories:¶
This specification requests IANA to add the following parameters to the "Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) RateLimit Parameters" registry defined in [RATELIMIT].¶
+=================+=================+================+===============+ | Field Name |Parameter Name |Description |Specification | +=================+=================+================+===============+ | RateLimit-Limit |ohttp-target |ohttp ratelimit |Section 3 of | | | | |this document | | RateLimit-Limit |attack-severity |ohttp ratelimit |Section 5 of | | | | |this document | +-----------------+-----------------+----------------+---------------+¶
Thanks to Lucas Pardue, Rich Salz, and Brandon Williams for the discussion and comments.¶