| Internet-Draft | Flowspec Redirect Load Balancing | March 2022 |
| Wu, et al. | Expires 8 September 2022 | [Page] |
This document defines an extension to "BGP Community Container Attribute" [I-D.ietf-idr-wide-bgp-communities] , which allows flowspec redirection to multiple paths. This extended community serves to redirect traffic to a load balancing group and supports both equal-cost multi-path(ECMP) and unequal-cost multi-path(UCMP) scenarios.¶
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119].¶
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.¶
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.¶
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."¶
This Internet-Draft will expire on 8 September 2022.¶
Copyright (c) 2022 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.¶
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License.¶
"Redirect to IP Extended Community", defined in [I-D.ietf-idr-flowspec-redirect-ip], allows traffic to be redirected to a specific IPv4 or IPv6 address, and [I-D.jiang-idr-ts-flowspec-srv6-policy] defines the redirection action to a SRv6 tunnel by additionally carrying the "Color Extended Community" [RFC8955].¶
However, scenarios involving redirection load balancing are not described in both documents. Although in some implementations, Equal-cost multi-path(ECMP) of "Redirect to IP" action can be achieved by encoding multiple redirect Extended Communities, the current set of mechanisms can hardly support neither ECMP of SRv6 tunnels nor unequal-cost multi-path(UCMP) of either types.¶
This document defines an extension to "BGP Community Container Attribute" [I-D.ietf-idr-wide-bgp-communities], the "Redirect Load Balancing Group" community. It is a new type of wide community container attribute with encoding format of multiple redirection path TLVs. Each of these TLVs represents a different redirection action. It allows traffic redirection to a load balancing group and supports both ECMP and UCMP scenarios.¶
This document introduces the following terms:¶
This document defines a new type of "BGP Community Container Attribute", the "Redirect Load Balancing Group" community type. The format complies with "BGP Community Container Attribute" [I-D.ietf-idr-wide-bgp-communities] and is shown below:¶
0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Type | Flags |C|T| Reserved | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Length | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Community Value: Redirect Load Balancing Group | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Source AS Number | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Context AS Number | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Param TLV | Length | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | | sub-TLVs | | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
The Type, Flags, Reserved and Length fields comply with the "BGP Community Container Attribute Common Header" definition.¶
The container type MUST be 1, which represents BGP Wide Community.¶
The Length field represents the total length of the container's contents in octets.¶
The Community Value, Source AS Number and Context AS Number fields comply with the corresponding definition in "BGP Community Container Attribute".¶
Community Value: 4 octets value that represents the "Redirect Load Balancing Group" community type. The value is TBD and requires IANA registration; See Section 5.1.¶
The BGP Wide Community Parameter TLV (Sub-Type 3) contains a list of atoms, comply with "BGP Wide Community Parameter(s) TLV" section of "BGP Community Container Attribute".¶
The Parameter TLV MUST present and SHOULD appear only once in a "Redirect Load Balancing Group" community container, no or multiple present SHOULD be considered malformed.¶
Sub-Type: Type 3 (BGP Wide Community Parameter TLV)¶
Length: Length of all the sub-TLVs in octets.¶
The list of atoms that Param Tlv contains. Each atom represents a different redirection path.¶
The general format of the sub-TLVs comply with atoms' format defined in "BGP Community Container Attribute", as below:¶
0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Type | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Length | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Value | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
The Type field is an octet from 1~254 (0 and 255 are reserved). Supported type of the sub-TLVs includes:¶
These sub-TLV types SHOULD be used exclusively within "Redirect Load Balancing Group" community containers.¶
The Length represents the length of the "Value" field in octets, and it is fixed for each specific sub-TLV.¶
If the length and type of a sub-TLV do not match, the "Redirect Load Balancing Group" community container SHOULD be considered malformed.¶
If a sub-TLV is a total dupilication of a previous one, the latter sub-TLV MUST be ignored.¶
In principle, sub-TLVs of different types may be combined in any mode. The supported combinations depend on the specific implementation.¶
Indicating the redirection path is unweighted and to a IPv4 address. The format is shown below:¶
0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Type: 1 | Length: 6 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Flag(2) | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | IPv4(4) | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Length: MUST be 6.¶
Flags: 2 octets, reserved for future use, MUST be set to 0 upon the sender and MUST be ignored upon the reciever.¶
IPv4: 4-octet IPv4 address, redirection destination¶
Indicating the redirection path is weighted and to a IPv4 address. The format is shown below:¶
0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Type: 2 | Length: 7 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Flag(2) | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | IPv4(4) | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Weight(1) | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Length: MUST be 7.¶
Flags: 2 octets, reserved for future use, MUST be set to 0 upon the sender and MUST be ignored upon the reciever.¶
IPv4: 4-octet IPv4 address, redirection destination¶
Weight: 1 octet, values from 1~255, load balancing weight¶
Indicating the redirection path is unweighted and to a SR-TE tunnel. The format is shown below:¶
0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Type: 3 | Length: 10 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Flag(2) | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | IPv4(4) | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Color(4) | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Length: MUST be 10.¶
Flags: 2 octets, reserved for future use, MUST be set to 0 upon the sender and MUST be ignored upon the reciever.¶
IPv4: 4-octet IPv4 address, SR-TE tunnel Endpoint for redirection¶
Color: 4 octets, SR-TE tunnel Color for redirection¶
Indicating the redirection path is weighted and to a SR-TE tunnel. The format is shown below:¶
0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Type: 4 | Length: 11 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Flag(2) | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | IPv4(4) | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Color(4) | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Weight(1) | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Length: MUST be 11.¶
Flags: 2 octets, reserved for future use, MUST be set to 0 upon the sender and MUST be ignored upon the reciever.¶
IPv4: 4-octet IPv4 address, SR-TE tunnel Endpoint for redirection¶
Color: 4 octets, SR-TE tunnel Color for redirection¶
Weight: 1 octet, values from 1~255, load balancing weight¶
Indicating the redirection path is unweighted and to a IPv6 address. The format is shown below:¶
0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Type: 5 | Length: 18 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Flag(2) | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | IPv6(16) | ~ ~ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Length: MUST be 18.¶
Flags: 2 octets, reserved for future use, MUST be set to 0 upon the sender and MUST be ignored upon the reciever.¶
IPv6: 16-octet IPv6 address, redirection destination¶
Indicating the redirection path is weighted and to a IPv6 address. The format is shown below:¶
0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Type: 6 | Length: 19 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Flag(2) | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | IPv6(16) | ~ ~ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Weight(1) | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Length: MUST be 19.¶
Flags: 2 octets, reserved for future use, MUST be set to 0 upon the sender and MUST be ignored upon the reciever.¶
IPv6: 16-octet IPv6 address, redirection destination¶
Weight: 1 octet, values from 1~255, load balancing weight¶
Indicating the redirection path is unweighted and to a SRv6 tunnel. The format is shown below:¶
0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Type: 7 | Length: 22 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Flag(2) | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | IPv6(16) | ~ ~ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Color(4) | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Length: MUST be 22.¶
Flags: 2 octets, reserved for future use, MUST be set to 0 upon the sender and MUST be ignored upon the reciever.¶
IPv6: 16-octet IPv6 address, SRv6 tunnel Endpoint for redirection¶
Color: 4 octets, SRv6 tunnel Color for redirection¶
Indicating the redirection path is weighted and to a SRv6 tunnel. The format is shown below:¶
0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Type: 8 | Length: 23 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Flag(2) | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | IPv6(16) | ~ ~ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Color(4) | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Weight(1) | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Length: MUST be 23.¶
Flags: 2 octets, reserved for future use, MUST be set to 0 upon the sender and MUST be ignored upon the reciever.¶
IPv6: 16-octet IPv6 address, SRv6 tunnel Endpoint for redirection¶
Color: 4 octets, SRv6 tunnel Color for redirection¶
Weight: 1 octet, values from 1~255, load balancing weight¶
This section describes a few use-case scenarios when deploying "Redirect Load Balancing Group" community type.¶
A system that originates a flowspec route with a "Redirect Load Balancing Group" community, among which its parameter TLV contains more than 1 atoms. If not all atoms are of a weighted type, these atoms will form a ECMP group.¶
Implementations MUST be prepared to accept a Parameter TLV with both weighted and unweighted atoms. In this case, the Weight field of the weighted atom SHOULD be ignored.¶
A system that originates a flowspec route with a "Redirect Load Balancing Group" community, among which its parameter TLV contains more than 1 atoms. If all atoms are of a weighted type, these atoms will form a UCMP group.¶
In this case, the Weight field value of these atoms SHOULD NOT be ignored, and the values are used as the ratio of the UCMP group.¶
Comply with Error Handling Procedure in "BGP Community Container Attribute" [I-D.ietf-idr-wide-bgp-communities].¶
In addition:¶
A "Redirect Load Balancing Group" community container with no or multiple parameter TLVs SHOULD be considered malformed, and a "treat as withdraw" behavior is expected.¶
If the length and type of a sub-TLV do not match, the "Redirect Load Balancing Group" community container SHOULD be considered malformed, and a "treat as withdraw" behavior is expected.¶
This document requests a new community value under "Registered Type 1 BGP Wide Community Community Types" registery. This registery is defined and requested in "BGP Community Container Attribute" [I-D.ietf-idr-wide-bgp-communities].¶
Requested value:¶
Name Type Value ---- ---------- Redirect Load Balancing Group TBD¶
A system that originates a flowspec route with a "Redirect Load Balancing Group" BGP wide community can cause many receivers of that route to redirect traffic to a single next-hop, overwhelming that next-hop and resulting in inadvertent or deliberate denial-of-service. This is also a concern about the "redirect to IP" extended community, therefore this document introduces no additional security considerations than those already covered in [RFC8955].¶