rfc9252.original | rfc9252.txt | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
BESS Working Group G. Dawra, Ed. | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) G. Dawra, Ed. | |||
Internet-Draft LinkedIn | Request for Comments: 9252 LinkedIn | |||
Intended status: Standards Track K. Talaulikar, Ed. | Category: Standards Track K. Talaulikar, Ed. | |||
Expires: September 23, 2022 Cisco Systems | ISSN: 2070-1721 Cisco Systems | |||
R. Raszuk | R. Raszuk | |||
NTT Network Innovations | NTT Network Innovations | |||
B. Decraene | B. Decraene | |||
Orange | Orange | |||
S. Zhuang | S. Zhuang | |||
Huawei Technologies | Huawei Technologies | |||
J. Rabadan | J. Rabadan | |||
Nokia | Nokia | |||
March 22, 2022 | June 2022 | |||
SRv6 BGP based Overlay Services | Segment Routing over IPv6 (SRv6) BGP-Based Overlay Services | |||
draft-ietf-bess-srv6-services-15 | ||||
Abstract | Abstract | |||
This document defines procedures and messages for SRv6-based BGP | This document defines procedures and messages for SRv6-based BGP | |||
services including L3VPN, EVPN, and Internet services. It builds on | services, including Layer 3 Virtual Private Network (L3VPN), Ethernet | |||
RFC4364 "BGP/MPLS IP Virtual Private Networks (VPNs)" and RFC7432 | VPN (EVPN), and Internet services. It builds on "BGP/MPLS IP Virtual | |||
"BGP MPLS-Based Ethernet VPN". | Private Networks (VPNs)" (RFC 4364) and "BGP MPLS-Based Ethernet VPN" | |||
(RFC 7432). | ||||
Status of This Memo | Status of This Memo | |||
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the | This is an Internet Standards Track document. | |||
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. | ||||
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering | ||||
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute | ||||
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- | ||||
Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. | ||||
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months | This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force | |||
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any | (IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has | |||
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference | received public review and has been approved for publication by the | |||
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." | Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on | |||
Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 7841. | ||||
This Internet-Draft will expire on September 23, 2022. | Information about the current status of this document, any errata, | |||
and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at | ||||
https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9252. | ||||
Copyright Notice | Copyright Notice | |||
Copyright (c) 2022 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the | Copyright (c) 2022 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the | |||
document authors. All rights reserved. | document authors. All rights reserved. | |||
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal | This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal | |||
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents | Provisions Relating to IETF Documents | |||
(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of | (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of | |||
publication of this document. Please review these documents | publication of this document. Please review these documents | |||
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect | carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect | |||
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must | to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must | |||
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of | include Revised BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the | |||
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as | Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described | |||
described in the Simplified BSD License. | in the Revised BSD License. | |||
Table of Contents | Table of Contents | |||
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 | 1. Introduction | |||
1.1. Requirements Language . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 | 1.1. Requirements Language | |||
2. SRv6 Services TLVs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 | 2. SRv6 Services TLVs | |||
3. SRv6 Service Sub-TLVs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 | 3. SRv6 Service Sub-TLVs | |||
3.1. SRv6 SID Information Sub-TLV . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 | 3.1. SRv6 SID Information Sub-TLV | |||
3.2. SRv6 Service Data Sub-Sub-TLVs . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 | 3.2. SRv6 Service Data Sub-Sub-TLVs | |||
3.2.1. SRv6 SID Structure Sub-Sub-TLV . . . . . . . . . . . 8 | 3.2.1. SRv6 SID Structure Sub-Sub-TLV | |||
4. Encoding SRv6 SID Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 | 4. Encoding SRv6 SID Information | |||
5. BGP based L3 Service over SRv6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 | 5. BGP-Based L3 Service over SRv6 | |||
5.1. IPv4 VPN Over SRv6 Core . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 | 5.1. IPv4 VPN over SRv6 Core | |||
5.2. IPv6 VPN Over SRv6 Core . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 | 5.2. IPv6 VPN over SRv6 Core | |||
5.3. Global IPv4 over SRv6 Core . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 | 5.3. Global IPv4 over SRv6 Core | |||
5.4. Global IPv6 over SRv6 Core . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 | 5.4. Global IPv6 over SRv6 Core | |||
6. BGP based Ethernet VPN (EVPN) over SRv6 . . . . . . . . . . . 14 | 6. BGP-Based Ethernet VPN (EVPN) over SRv6 | |||
6.1. Ethernet Auto-discovery Route over SRv6 Core . . . . . . 16 | 6.1. Ethernet Auto-Discovery Route over SRv6 Core | |||
6.1.1. Ethernet A-D per ES Route . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 | 6.1.1. Ethernet A-D per ES Route | |||
6.1.2. Ethernet A-D per EVI Route . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 | 6.1.2. Ethernet A-D per EVI Route | |||
6.2. MAC/IP Advertisement Route over SRv6 Core . . . . . . . . 17 | 6.2. MAC/IP Advertisement Route over SRv6 Core | |||
6.2.1. MAC/IP Advertisement Route with MAC Only . . . . . . 19 | 6.2.1. MAC/IP Advertisement Route with MAC Only | |||
6.2.2. MAC/IP Advertisement Route with MAC+IP . . . . . . . 19 | 6.2.2. MAC/IP Advertisement Route with MAC+IP | |||
6.3. Inclusive Multicast Ethernet Tag Route over SRv6 Core . . 20 | 6.3. Inclusive Multicast Ethernet Tag Route over SRv6 Core | |||
6.4. Ethernet Segment Route over SRv6 Core . . . . . . . . . . 21 | 6.4. Ethernet Segment Route over SRv6 Core | |||
6.5. IP Prefix Route over SRv6 Core . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 | 6.5. IP Prefix Route over SRv6 Core | |||
6.6. EVPN Multicast Routes (Route Types 6, 7, 8) over SRv6 | 6.6. EVPN Multicast Routes (Route Types 6, 7, and 8) over SRv6 | |||
Core . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 | Core | |||
7. Implementation Status . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 | 7. Error Handling | |||
8. Error Handling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 | 8. IANA Considerations | |||
9. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 | 8.1. BGP Prefix-SID TLV Types Registry | |||
9.1. BGP Prefix-SID TLV Types Registry . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 | 8.2. SRv6 Service Sub-TLV Types Registry | |||
9.2. SRv6 Service Sub-TLV Types Registry . . . . . . . . . . . 25 | 8.3. SRv6 Service Data Sub-Sub-TLV Types Registry | |||
9.3. SRv6 Service Data Sub-Sub-TLV Types Registry . . . . . . 25 | 8.4. BGP SRv6 Service SID Flags Registry | |||
9.4. BGP SRv6 Service SID Flags Registry . . . . . . . . . . . 26 | 8.5. SAFI Values Registry | |||
9.5. Subsequent Address Family Identifiers (SAFI) Parameters | 9. Security Considerations | |||
Registry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 | 9.1. Considerations Related to BGP Sessions | |||
10. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 | 9.2. Considerations Related to BGP Services | |||
10.1. BGP Session Related Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . 26 | 9.3. Considerations Related to SR over IPv6 Data Plane | |||
10.2. BGP Services Related Considerations . . . . . . . . . . 26 | 10. References | |||
10.3. SR over IPv6 Data Plane Related Considerations . . . . . 27 | 10.1. Normative References | |||
11. Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 | 10.2. Informative References | |||
12. Contributors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 | Acknowledgements | |||
13. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 | Contributors | |||
13.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 | Authors' Addresses | |||
13.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 | ||||
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 | ||||
1. Introduction | 1. Introduction | |||
SRv6 refers to Segment Routing instantiated on the IPv6 dataplane | SRv6 refers to Segment Routing instantiated on the IPv6 data plane | |||
[RFC8402]. | [RFC8402]. | |||
BGP is used to advertise the reachability of prefixes of a particular | BGP is used to advertise the reachability of prefixes of a particular | |||
service from an egress PE to ingress PE nodes. | service from an egress Provider Edge (PE) to ingress PE nodes. | |||
SRv6 based BGP services refers to the Layer-3 and Layer-2 overlay | SRv6-based BGP services refer to the Layer 3 (L3) and Layer 2 (L2) | |||
services with BGP as control plane and SRv6 as dataplane. This | overlay services with BGP as the control plane and SRv6 as the data | |||
document defines procedures and messages for SRv6-based BGP services | plane. This document defines procedures and messages for SRv6-based | |||
including L3VPN, EVPN, and Internet services. It builds on [RFC4364] | BGP services, including L3VPN, EVPN, and Internet services. It | |||
"BGP/MPLS IP Virtual Private Networks (VPNs)" and [RFC7432] "BGP | builds on "BGP/MPLS IP Virtual Private Networks (VPNs)" [RFC4364] and | |||
MPLS-Based Ethernet VPN". | "BGP MPLS-Based Ethernet VPN" [RFC7432]. | |||
SRv6 SID refers to an SRv6 Segment Identifier as defined in | SRv6 SID refers to an SRv6 Segment Identifier, as defined in | |||
[RFC8402]. | [RFC8402]. | |||
SRv6 Service SID refers to an SRv6 SID associated with one of the | SRv6 Service SID refers to an SRv6 SID associated with one of the | |||
service-specific SRv6 Endpoint behaviors on the advertising Provider | service-specific SRv6 Endpoint behaviors on the advertising PE | |||
Edge (PE) router, such as (but not limited to), End.DT (Table lookup | router, such as (but not limited to) End.DT (table look up in VPN | |||
in a VRF) or End.DX (cross-connect to a nexthop) behaviors in the | Routing and Forwarding (VRF)) or End.DX (cross-connect to a next hop) | |||
case of Layer-3 Virtual Private Network (L3VPN) service as defined in | behaviors in the case of L3VPN service, as defined in [RFC8986]. | |||
[RFC8986]. This document describes how existing BGP messages between | This document describes how existing BGP messages between PEs may | |||
PEs may carry SRv6 Service SIDs to interconnect PEs and form VPNs. | carry SRv6 Service SIDs to interconnect PEs and form VPNs. | |||
To provide SRv6 service with best-effort connectivity, the egress PE | To provide SRv6 service with best-effort connectivity, the egress PE | |||
signals an SRv6 Service SID with the BGP overlay service route. The | signals an SRv6 Service SID with the BGP overlay service route. The | |||
ingress PE encapsulates the payload in an outer IPv6 header where the | ingress PE encapsulates the payload in an outer IPv6 header where the | |||
destination address is the SRv6 Service SID provided by the egress | destination address is the SRv6 Service SID provided by the egress | |||
Provider Edge (PE). The underlay between the PEs only needs to | PE. The underlay between the PEs only needs to support plain IPv6 | |||
support plain IPv6 forwarding [RFC8200]. | forwarding [RFC8200]. | |||
To provide SRv6 service in conjunction with an underlay SLA from the | To provide SRv6 service in conjunction with an underlay Service Level | |||
ingress PE to the egress PE, the egress PE colors the overlay service | Agreement (SLA) from the ingress PE to the egress PE, the egress PE | |||
route with a Color Extended Community | colors the overlay service route with a Color Extended Community | |||
[I-D.ietf-idr-segment-routing-te-policy] for steering of flows for | [IDR-SEGMENT-ROUTING-TE-POLICY] for steering flows for those routes, | |||
those routes as specified in section 8 of | as specified in Section 8 of [IGMP-MLD-EVPN]. The ingress PE | |||
[I-D.ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy]. The ingress PE | encapsulates the payload packet in an outer IPv6 header with the SR | |||
encapsulates the payload packet in an outer IPv6 header with the | Policy segment list associated with the related SLA along with the | |||
segment list of SR policy associated with the related SLA along with | SRv6 Service SID associated with the route using the Segment Routing | |||
the SRv6 Service SID associated with the route using the Segment | Header (SRH) [RFC8754]. The underlay nodes whose SRv6 SIDs are part | |||
Routing Header (SRH) [RFC8754]. The underlay nodes whose SRv6 SID's | of the SRH segment list MUST support the SRv6 data plane. | |||
are part of the SRH segment list MUST support SRv6 data plane. | ||||
1.1. Requirements Language | 1.1. Requirements Language | |||
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", | The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", | |||
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and | "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and | |||
"OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP | "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in | |||
14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all | BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all | |||
capitals, as shown here. | capitals, as shown here. | |||
2. SRv6 Services TLVs | 2. SRv6 Services TLVs | |||
This document extends the use of the BGP Prefix-SID attribute | This document extends the use of the BGP Prefix-SID attribute | |||
[RFC8669] to carry SRv6 SIDs and their associated information with | [RFC8669] to carry SRv6 SIDs and their associated information with | |||
the BGP address-families that are listed further in this section. | the BGP address families that are listed further in this section. | |||
The SRv6 Service TLVs are defined as two new TLVs of the BGP Prefix- | The SRv6 Service TLVs are defined as two new TLVs of the BGP Prefix- | |||
SID Attribute to achieve signaling of SRv6 SIDs for L3 and L2 | SID attribute to achieve signaling of SRv6 SIDs for L3 and L2 | |||
services. | services. | |||
o SRv6 L3 Service TLV: This TLV encodes Service SID information for | SRv6 L3 Service TLV: | |||
SRv6 based L3 services. It corresponds to the equivalent | This TLV encodes Service SID information for SRv6-based L3 | |||
functionality provided by an MPLS Label when received with a Layer | services. It corresponds to the equivalent functionality provided | |||
3 service route as defined in [RFC4364] [RFC4659] [RFC8950] | by an MPLS Label when received with a Layer 3 service route, as | |||
[RFC9136]. Some SRv6 Endpoint behaviors which may be encoded, but | defined in [RFC4364], [RFC4659], [RFC8950], and [RFC9136]. Some | |||
not limited to, are End.DX4, End.DT4, End.DX6, End.DT6, and | SRv6 Endpoint behaviors that may be encoded, but not limited to, | |||
End.DT46. | are End.DX4, End.DT4, End.DX6, End.DT6, and End.DT46. | |||
o SRv6 L2 Service TLV: This TLV encodes Service SID information for | SRv6 L2 Service TLV: | |||
SRv6 based L2 services. It corresponds to the equivalent | This TLV encodes Service SID information for SRv6-based L2 | |||
functionality provided by an MPLS Label1 for Ethernet VPN (EVPN) | services. It corresponds to the equivalent functionality provided | |||
Route-Types as defined in [RFC7432]. Some SRv6 Endpoint behaviors | by an MPLS Label1 for Ethernet VPN (EVPN) Route Types, as defined | |||
which may be encoded, but not limited to, are End.DX2, End.DX2V, | in [RFC7432]. Some SRv6 Endpoint behaviors that may be encoded | |||
End.DT2U, and End.DT2M. | are, but not limited to, End.DX2, End.DX2V, End.DT2U, and | |||
End.DT2M. | ||||
When an egress PE is enabled for BGP Services over SRv6 data-plane, | When an egress PE is enabled for BGP Services over the SRv6 data | |||
it signals one or more SRv6 Service SIDs enclosed in SRv6 Service | plane, it signals one or more SRv6 Service SIDs enclosed in an SRv6 | |||
TLV(s) within the BGP Prefix-SID Attribute attached to MP-BGP NLRIs | Service TLV(s) within the BGP Prefix-SID attribute attached to | |||
defined in [RFC4760] [RFC4659] [RFC8950] [RFC7432] [RFC4364] | Multiprotocol BGP (MP-BGP) Network Layer Reachability Information | |||
[RFC9136] where applicable as described in Section 5 and Section 6. | (NLRI) defined in [RFC4760], [RFC4659], [RFC8950], [RFC7432], | |||
[RFC4364], and [RFC9136], where applicable, as described in Sections | ||||
5 and 6. | ||||
The support for BGP Multicast VPN (MVPN) Services [RFC6513] with SRv6 | The support for BGP Multicast VPN (MVPN) Services [RFC6513] with SRv6 | |||
is outside the scope of this document. | is outside the scope of this document. | |||
The following depicts the SRv6 Service TLVs encoded in the BGP | The following depicts the SRv6 Service TLVs encoded in the BGP | |||
Prefix-SID Attribute: | Prefix-SID attribute: | |||
0 1 2 3 | 0 1 2 3 | |||
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 | 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 | |||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | |||
| TLV Type | TLV Length | RESERVED | | | TLV Type | TLV Length | RESERVED | | |||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | |||
| SRv6 Service Sub-TLVs // | | SRv6 Service Sub-TLVs // | |||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | |||
Figure 1: SRv6 Service TLVs | Figure 1: SRv6 Service TLVs | |||
o TLV Type (1 octet): This field is assigned values from the IANA | TLV Type (1 octet): | |||
registry "BGP Prefix-SID TLV Types". It is set to 5 for SRv6 L3 | This field is assigned values from IANA's "BGP Prefix-SID TLV | |||
Service TLV. It is set to 6 for SRv6 L2 Service TLV. | Types" subregistry. It is set to 5 for the SRv6 L3 Service TLV. | |||
It is set to 6 for the SRv6 L2 Service TLV. | ||||
o TLV Length (2 octets): Specifies the total length, in octets, of | TLV Length (2 octets): | |||
the TLV Value. | This field specifies the total length, in octets, of the TLV | |||
Value. | ||||
o RESERVED (1 octet): This field is reserved; it MUST be set to 0 by | RESERVED (1 octet): | |||
the sender and ignored by the receiver. | This field is reserved; it MUST be set to 0 by the sender and | |||
ignored by the receiver. | ||||
o SRv6 Service Sub-TLVs (variable): This field contains SRv6 Service | SRv6 Service Sub-TLVs (variable): | |||
related information and is encoded as an unordered list of Sub- | This field contains SRv6 Service-related information and is | |||
TLVs whose format is described below. | encoded as an unordered list of Sub-TLVs whose format is described | |||
below. | ||||
A BGP speaker receiving a route containing BGP Prefix-SID Attribute | A BGP speaker receiving a route containing the BGP Prefix-SID | |||
with one or more SRv6 Service TLVs observes the following rules when | attribute with one or more SRv6 Service TLVs observes the following | |||
advertising the received route to other peers: | rules when advertising the received route to other peers: | |||
o if the nexthop is unchanged during the advertisement, the SRv6 | * If the next hop is unchanged during the advertisement, the SRv6 | |||
Service TLVs, including any unrecognized Types of Sub-TLV and Sub- | Service TLVs, including any unrecognized Types of Sub-TLV and Sub- | |||
Sub-TLV, SHOULD be propagated further. In addition, all Reserved | Sub-TLV, SHOULD be propagated further. In addition, all Reserved | |||
fields in the TLV or Sub-TLV or Sub-Sub-TLV MUST be propagated | fields in the TLV, Sub-TLV, or Sub-Sub-TLV MUST be propagated | |||
unchanged. | unchanged. | |||
o if the nexthop is changed, the TLVs, Sub-TLVs, and Sub-Sub-TLVs | * If the next hop is changed, the TLVs, Sub-TLVs, and Sub-Sub-TLVs | |||
SHOULD be updated with the locally allocated SRv6 SID information. | SHOULD be updated with the locally allocated SRv6 SID information. | |||
Any unrecognized received Sub-TLVs and Sub-Sub-TLVs MUST be | Any unrecognized, received Sub-TLVs and Sub-Sub-TLVs MUST be | |||
removed. | removed. | |||
3. SRv6 Service Sub-TLVs | 3. SRv6 Service Sub-TLVs | |||
The format of a single SRv6 Service Sub-TLV is depicted below: | The format of a single SRv6 Service Sub-TLV is depicted below: | |||
0 1 2 3 | 0 1 2 3 | |||
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 | 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 | |||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | |||
| SRv6 Service | SRv6 Service | SRv6 Service // | | SRv6 Service | SRv6 Service | SRv6 Service // | |||
| Sub-TLV | Sub-TLV | Sub-TLV // | | Sub-TLV | Sub-TLV | Sub-TLV // | |||
| Type | Length | value // | | Type | Length | Value // | |||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | |||
Figure 2: SRv6 Service Sub-TLVs | Figure 2: SRv6 Service Sub-TLVs | |||
o SRv6 Service Sub-TLV Type (1 octet): Identifies the type of SRv6 | SRv6 Service Sub-TLV Type (1 octet): | |||
service information. It is assigned values from the IANA Registry | This field identifies the type of SRv6 service information. It is | |||
"SRv6 Service Sub-TLV Types". | assigned values from IANA's "SRv6 Service Sub-TLV Types" | |||
subregistry. | ||||
o SRv6 Service Sub-TLV Length (2 octets): Specifies the total | SRv6 Service Sub-TLV Length (2 octets): | |||
length, in octets, of the Sub-TLV Value field. | This field specifies the total length, in octets, of the Sub-TLV | |||
Value field. | ||||
o SRv6 Service Sub-TLV Value (variable): Contains data specific to | SRv6 Service Sub-TLV Value (variable): | |||
the Sub-TLV Type. In addition to fixed-length data, it contains | This field contains data specific to the Sub-TLV Type. In | |||
other properties of the SRv6 Service encoded as a set of SRv6 | addition to fixed-length data, it contains other properties of the | |||
Service Data Sub-Sub-TLVs whose format is described in Section 3.2 | SRv6 Service encoded as a set of SRv6 Service Data Sub-Sub-TLVs | |||
below. | whose format is described in Section 3.2 below. | |||
3.1. SRv6 SID Information Sub-TLV | 3.1. SRv6 SID Information Sub-TLV | |||
SRv6 Service Sub-TLV Type 1 is assigned for SRv6 SID Information Sub- | SRv6 Service Sub-TLV Type 1 is assigned for the SRv6 SID Information | |||
TLV. This Sub-TLV contains a single SRv6 SID along with its | Sub-TLV. This Sub-TLV contains a single SRv6 SID along with its | |||
properties. Its encoding is depicted below: | properties. Its encoding is depicted below: | |||
0 1 2 3 | 0 1 2 3 | |||
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 | 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 | |||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | |||
| SRv6 Service | SRv6 Service | | | | SRv6 Service | SRv6 Service | | | |||
| Sub-TLV | Sub-TLV | | | | Sub-TLV | Sub-TLV | | | |||
| Type=1 | Length | RESERVED1 | | | Type=1 | Length | RESERVED1 | | |||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | |||
| SRv6 SID Value (16 octets) // | | SRv6 SID Value (16 octets) // | |||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | |||
| Svc SID Flags | SRv6 Endpoint Behavior | RESERVED2 | | | Svc SID Flags | SRv6 Endpoint Behavior | RESERVED2 | | |||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | |||
| SRv6 Service Data Sub-Sub-TLVs // | | SRv6 Service Data Sub-Sub-TLVs // | |||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | |||
Figure 3: SRv6 SID Information Sub-TLV | Figure 3: SRv6 SID Information Sub-TLV | |||
o SRv6 Service Sub-TLV Type (1 octet): This field is set to 1 to | SRv6 Service Sub-TLV Type (1 octet): | |||
represent SRv6 SID Information Sub-TLV. | This field is set to 1 to represent the SRv6 SID Information Sub- | |||
TLV. | ||||
o SRv6 Service Sub-TLV Length (2 octets): This field contains the | SRv6 Service Sub-TLV Length (2 octets): | |||
total length, in octets, of the Value field of the Sub-TLV. | This field contains the total length, in octets, of the Value | |||
field of the Sub-TLV. | ||||
o RESERVED1 (1 octet): MUST be set to 0 by the sender and ignored by | RESERVED1 (1 octet): | |||
the receiver. | This field MUST be set to 0 by the sender and ignored by the | |||
receiver. | ||||
o SRv6 SID Value (16 octets): Encodes an SRv6 SID as defined in | SRv6 SID Value (16 octets): | |||
[RFC8986] | This field encodes an SRv6 SID, as defined in [RFC8986]. | |||
o SRv6 Service SID Flags (1 octet): Encodes SRv6 Service SID Flags - | SRv6 Service SID Flags (1 octet): | |||
none are currently defined. SHOULD be set to 0 by the sender and | This field encodes SRv6 Service SID Flags -- none are currently | |||
any unknown flags MUST be ignored by the receiver. | defined. It SHOULD be set to 0 by the sender and any unknown | |||
flags MUST be ignored by the receiver. | ||||
o SRv6 Endpoint Behavior (2 octets): Encodes SRv6 Endpoint behavior | SRv6 Endpoint Behavior (2 octets): | |||
codepoint value that is associated with SRv6 SID. The codepoints | This field encodes the SRv6 Endpoint behavior codepoint value that | |||
used are from the "SRv6 Endpoint Behavior" registry under the IANA | is associated with the SRv6 SID. The codepoints used are from | |||
"Segment Routing" parameters registry that was introduced by | IANA's "SRv6 Endpoint Behaviors" subregistry under the "Segment | |||
[RFC8986]. The opaque endpoint behavior (i.e., value 0xFFFF) MAY | Routing" registry that was introduced by [RFC8986]. The opaque | |||
be used when the advertising router wishes to abstract the actual | endpoint behavior (i.e., value 0xFFFF) MAY be used when the | |||
behavior of it's locally instantiated SRv6 SID. | advertising router wishes to abstract the actual behavior of its | |||
locally instantiated SRv6 SID. | ||||
o RESERVED2 (1 octet): MUST be set to 0 by the sender and ignored by | RESERVED2 (1 octet): | |||
the receiver. | This field MUST be set to 0 by the sender and ignored by the | |||
receiver. | ||||
o SRv6 Service Data Sub-Sub-TLV Value (variable): Used to advertise | SRv6 Service Data Sub-Sub-TLV Value (variable): | |||
properties of the SRv6 SID. It is encoded as a set of SRv6 | This field is used to advertise properties of the SRv6 SID. It is | |||
Service Data Sub-Sub-TLVs. | encoded as a set of SRv6 Service Data Sub-Sub-TLVs. | |||
The choice of SRv6 Endpoint behavior of the SRv6 SID is entirely up | The choice of SRv6 Endpoint behavior of the SRv6 SID is entirely up | |||
to the originator of the advertisement. While Section 5 and | to the originator of the advertisement. While Sections 5 and 6 list | |||
Section 6 list the SRv6 Endpoint Behaviors that are normally expected | the SRv6 Endpoint Behaviors that are normally expected to be used by | |||
to be used by the specific route advertisements, the reception of | the specific route advertisements, the reception of other SRv6 | |||
other SRv6 Endpoint behaviors (e.g., new behaviors that may be | Endpoint behaviors (e.g., new behaviors that may be introduced in the | |||
introduced in the future) is not considered an error. An | future) is not considered an error. An unrecognized endpoint | |||
unrecognized endpoint behavior MUST NOT be considered invalid by the | behavior MUST NOT be considered invalid by the receiver, except for | |||
receiver except for behaviors that involve the use of arguments | behaviors that involve the use of arguments (refer to Section 3.2.1 | |||
(refer to Section 3.2.1 for details on argument validation). An | for details on argument validation). An implementation MAY log a | |||
implementation MAY log a rate-limited warning when it receives an | rate-limited warning when it receives an unexpected behavior. | |||
unexpected behavior. | ||||
When multiple SRv6 SID Information Sub-TLVs are present, the ingress | When multiple SRv6 SID Information Sub-TLVs are present, the ingress | |||
PE SHOULD use the SRv6 SID from the first instance of the Sub-TLV. | PE SHOULD use the SRv6 SID from the first instance of the Sub-TLV. | |||
An implementation MAY provide a local policy to override this | An implementation MAY provide a local policy to override this | |||
selection. | selection. | |||
3.2. SRv6 Service Data Sub-Sub-TLVs | 3.2. SRv6 Service Data Sub-Sub-TLVs | |||
The format of the SRv6 Service Data Sub-Sub-TLV is depicted below: | The format of the SRv6 Service Data Sub-Sub-TLV is depicted below: | |||
0 1 2 3 | 0 1 2 3 | |||
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 | 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 | |||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | |||
| Service Data | Sub-Sub-TLV Length |Sub-Sub TLV // | | Service Data | Sub-Sub-TLV Length |Sub-Sub TLV // | |||
| Sub-Sub-TLV | | Value // | | Sub-Sub-TLV | | Value // | |||
| Type | | // | | Type | | // | |||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | |||
Figure 4: SRv6 Service Data Sub-Sub-TLVs | Figure 4: SRv6 Service Data Sub-Sub-TLVs | |||
o SRv6 Service Data Sub-Sub-TLV Type (1 octet): Identifies the type | SRv6 Service Data Sub-Sub-TLV Type (1 octet): | |||
of Sub-Sub-TLV. It is assigned values from the IANA Registry | This field identifies the type of Sub-Sub-TLV. It is assigned | |||
"SRv6 Service Data Sub-Sub-TLVs". | values from IANA's "SRv6 Service Data Sub-Sub-TLV Types" | |||
subregistry. | ||||
o SRv6 Service Data Sub-Sub-TLV Length (2 octets): Specifies the | SRv6 Service Data Sub-Sub-TLV Length (2 octets): | |||
total length, in octets, of the Sub-Sub-TLV Value field. | This field specifies the total length, in octets, of the Sub-Sub- | |||
TLV Value field. | ||||
o SRv6 Service Data Sub-Sub-TLV Value (variable): Contains data | SRv6 Service Data Sub-Sub-TLV Value (variable): | |||
specific to the Sub-Sub-TLV Type. | This field contains data specific to the Sub-Sub-TLV Type. | |||
3.2.1. SRv6 SID Structure Sub-Sub-TLV | 3.2.1. SRv6 SID Structure Sub-Sub-TLV | |||
SRv6 Service Data Sub-Sub-TLV Type 1 is assigned for SRv6 SID | SRv6 Service Data Sub-Sub-TLV Type 1 is assigned for the SRv6 SID | |||
structure Sub-Sub-TLV. SRv6 SID Structure Sub-Sub-TLV is used to | Structure Sub-Sub-TLV. The SRv6 SID Structure Sub-Sub-TLV is used to | |||
advertise the lengths of the individual parts of the SRv6 SID as | advertise the lengths of the individual parts of the SRv6 SID, as | |||
defined in [RFC8986]. The terms Locator Block and Locator Node | defined in [RFC8986]. The terms Locator Block and Locator Node | |||
correspond to the B and N parts respectively of the SRv6 Locator that | correspond to the B and N parts, respectively, of the SRv6 Locator | |||
are defined in section 3.1 of [RFC8986]. It is carried as Sub-Sub- | that is defined in Section 3.1 of [RFC8986]. It is carried as Sub- | |||
TLV in SRv6 SID Information Sub-TLV | Sub-TLV in the SRv6 SID Information Sub-TLV. | |||
0 1 2 3 | ||||
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 | ||||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | ||||
| SRv6 Service | SRv6 Service | Locator Block | | ||||
| Data Sub-Sub | Data Sub-Sub-TLV | Length | | ||||
| -TLV Type=1 | Length | | | ||||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | ||||
| Locator Node | Function | Argument | Transposition | | ||||
| Length | Length | Length | Length | | ||||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | ||||
| Transposition | | ||||
| Offset | | ||||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | ||||
Figure 5: SRv6 SID Structure Sub-Sub-TLV | 0 1 2 3 | |||
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 | ||||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | ||||
| SRv6 Service | SRv6 Service | Locator Block | | ||||
| Data Sub-Sub | Data Sub-Sub-TLV | Length | | ||||
| -TLV Type=1 | Length | | | ||||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | ||||
| Locator Node | Function | Argument | Transposition | | ||||
| Length | Length | Length | Length | | ||||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | ||||
| Transposition | | ||||
| Offset | | ||||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | ||||
o SRv6 Service Data Sub-Sub-TLV Type (1 octet): This field is set to | Figure 5: SRv6 SID Structure Sub-Sub-TLV | |||
1 to represent SRv6 SID Structure Sub-Sub-TLV. | ||||
o SRv6 Service Data Sub-Sub-TLV Length (2 octets): This field | SRv6 Service Data Sub-Sub-TLV Type (1 octet): | |||
contains a total length of 6 octets. | This field is set to 1 to represent the SRv6 SID Structure Sub- | |||
Sub-TLV. | ||||
o Locator Block Length (1 octet): Contains the length of SRv6 SID | SRv6 Service Data Sub-Sub-TLV Length (2 octets): | |||
Locator Block in bits. | This field contains a total length of 6 octets. | |||
o Locator Node Length (1 octet): Contains the length of SRv6 SID | Locator Block Length (1 octet): | |||
Locator Node in bits. | This field contains the length of the SRv6 SID Locator Block in | |||
bits. | ||||
o Function Length (1 octet): Contains the length of SRv6 SID | Locator Node Length (1 octet): | |||
Function in bits. | This field contains the length of the SRv6 SID Locator Node in | |||
bits. | ||||
o Argument Length (1 octet): Contains the length of SRv6 SID | Function Length (1 octet): | |||
Argument in bits. | This field contains the length of the SRv6 SID Function in bits. | |||
o Transposition Length (1 octet): Size in bits for the part of SID | Argument Length (1 octet): | |||
that has been transposed (or shifted) into a MPLS label field | This field contains the length of the SRv6 SID Argument in bits. | |||
o Transposition Offset (1 octet): The offset position in bits for | Transposition Length (1 octet): | |||
the part of SID that has been transposed (or shifted) into a MPLS | This field is the size in bits for the part of the SID that has | |||
label field. | been transposed (or shifted) into an MPLS label field. | |||
Section 4 describes mechanisms for signaling of the SRv6 Service SID | Transposition Offset (1 octet): | |||
by transposing a variable part of the SRv6 SID value and carrying | This field is the offset position in bits for the part of the SID | |||
that has been transposed (or shifted) into an MPLS label field. | ||||
Section 4 describes mechanisms for the signaling of the SRv6 Service | ||||
SID by transposing a variable part of the SRv6 SID value and carrying | ||||
them in existing MPLS label fields to achieve more efficient packing | them in existing MPLS label fields to achieve more efficient packing | |||
of those service prefix NLRIs in BGP update messages. The SRv6 SID | of those service prefix NLRIs in BGP update messages. The SRv6 SID | |||
Structure Sub-Sub-TLV contains appropriate length fields when the | Structure Sub-Sub-TLV contains appropriate length fields when the | |||
SRv6 Service SID is signaled in split parts to enable the receiver to | SRv6 Service SID is signaled in split parts to enable the receiver to | |||
put together the SID accurately. | put together the SID accurately. | |||
Transposition Offset indicates the bit position and Transposition | Transposition Offset indicates the bit position, and Transposition | |||
Length indicates the number of bits that are being taken out of the | Length indicates the number of bits that are being taken out of the | |||
SRv6 SID value and put into high order bits of MPLS label field. The | SRv6 SID value and put into high order bits of the MPLS label field. | |||
bits that have been shifted out MUST be set to 0 in the SID value. | The bits that have been shifted out MUST be set to 0 in the SID | |||
value. | ||||
Transposition Length of 0 indicates nothing is transposed and that | A Transposition Length of 0 indicates nothing is transposed and that | |||
the entire SRv6 SID value is encoded in the SID Information Sub-TLV. | the entire SRv6 SID value is encoded in the SID Information Sub-TLV. | |||
In this case, the Transposition Offset MUST be set to 0. | In this case, the Transposition Offset MUST be set to 0. | |||
The size of the MPLS label field limits the bits transposed from the | The size of the MPLS label field limits the bits transposed from the | |||
SRv6 SID value into it. E.g., the size of MPLS label field in | SRv6 SID value into it. For example, the size of the MPLS label | |||
[RFC4364] [RFC8277] is 20 bits while in [RFC7432] is 24 bits. | field is 20 bits in [RFC4364] and [RFC8277] and 24 bits in [RFC7432]. | |||
As defined in [RFC8986], the sum of the Locator Block Length (LBL), | As defined in [RFC8986], the sum of the Locator Block Length (LBL), | |||
Locator Node Length (LNL), Function Length (FL), and Argument Length | Locator Node Length (LNL), Function Length (FL), and Argument Length | |||
(AL) fields MUST be less than or equal to 128 and greater than the | (AL) fields MUST be less than or equal to 128 and greater than the | |||
sum of Transposition Offset and Transposition Length. | sum of Transposition Offset and Transposition Length. | |||
As an example, consider that the sum of the Locator Block and the | As an example, consider that the sum of the Locator Block and the | |||
Locator Node parts is 64. For an SRv6 SID where the entire Function | Locator Node parts is 64. For an SRv6 SID where the entire Function | |||
part of size 16 bits is transposed, then the transposition offset is | part of size 16 bits is transposed, the transposition offset is set | |||
set to 64 and the transposition length is set to 16. While for an | to 64 and the transposition length is set to 16. While for an SRv6 | |||
SRv6 SID where the Function length is 24 bits and only the lower | SID, where the FL is 24 bits and only the lower order 20 bits are | |||
order 20 bits are transposed (e.g. due to the limit of the MPLS label | transposed (e.g., due to the limit of the MPLS label field size), the | |||
field size), then the transposition offset is set to 68 and the | transposition offset is set to 68 and the transposition length is set | |||
transposition length is set to 20. | to 20. | |||
BGP speakers that do not support this specification may misinterpret, | BGP speakers that do not support this specification may misinterpret, | |||
on the reception of an SRv6-based BGP service route update, the part | on the reception of an SRv6-based BGP service route update, the part | |||
of the SRv6 SID encoded in MPLS label field(s) as MPLS label values | of the SRv6 SID encoded in an MPLS label field(s) as MPLS label | |||
for MPLS-based services. Implementations supporting this | values for MPLS-based services. Implementations supporting this | |||
specification MUST provide a mechanism to control the advertisement | specification MUST provide a mechanism to control the advertisement | |||
of SRv6-based BGP service routes on a per-neighbor and per-service | of SRv6-based BGP service routes on a per-neighbor and per-service | |||
basis. The details of deployment designs and implementation options | basis. The details of deployment designs and implementation options | |||
are outside the scope of this document. | are outside the scope of this document. | |||
Arguments may be generally applicable for SIDs of only specific SRv6 | Arguments may be generally applicable for SIDs of only specific SRv6 | |||
Endpoint behaviors (e.g., End.DT2M) and therefore the Argument length | Endpoint behaviors (e.g., End.DT2M); therefore, the AL MUST be set to | |||
MUST be set to 0 for SIDs where the Argument is not applicable. A | 0 for SIDs where the Argument is not applicable. A receiver is | |||
receiver is unable to validate the applicability of arguments for | unable to validate the applicability of arguments for SRv6 Endpoint | |||
SRv6 Endpoint behaviors that are unknown to it and hence MUST ignore | behaviors that are unknown to it and hence MUST ignore SRv6 SIDs with | |||
SRv6 SIDs with arguments (indicated by non-zero argument length) with | arguments (indicated by a non-zero AL) with unknown endpoint | |||
unknown endpoint behaviors. For SIDs corresponding to an endpoint | behaviors. For SIDs corresponding to an endpoint behavior that is | |||
behavior that is known, a receiver MUST validate that the consistency | known, a receiver MUST validate that the consistency of the AL with | |||
of the argument length with the specific endpoint behavior | the specific endpoint behavior definition. | |||
definition. | ||||
4. Encoding SRv6 SID Information | 4. Encoding SRv6 SID Information | |||
The SRv6 Service SID(s) for a BGP Service Prefix are carried in the | The SRv6 Service SID(s) for a BGP service prefix is carried in the | |||
SRv6 Services TLVs of the BGP Prefix-SID Attribute. | SRv6 Services TLVs of the BGP Prefix-SID attribute. | |||
For certain types of BGP Services like L3VPN where a per-VRF SID | For certain types of BGP Services, like L3VPN where a per-VRF SID | |||
allocation is used (i.e., End.DT4 or End.DT6 behaviors), the same SID | allocation is used (i.e., End.DT4 or End.DT6 behaviors), the same SID | |||
is shared across multiple NLRIs thus providing efficient packing. | is shared across multiple NLRIs, thus providing efficient packing. | |||
However, for certain other types of BGP Services like EVPN VPWS where | However, for certain other types of BGP Services, like EVPN Virtual | |||
a per-PW SID allocation is required (i.e., End.DX2 behavior), each | Private Wire Service (VPWS) where a per-PW SID allocation is required | |||
NLRI would have its own unique SID thereby resulting in inefficient | (i.e., End.DX2 behavior), each NLRI would have its own unique SID, | |||
packing. | thereby resulting in inefficient packing. | |||
To achieve efficient packing, this document allows the encoding of | To achieve efficient packing, this document allows the encoding of | |||
the SRv6 Service SID either as a whole in the SRv6 Services TLVs or | the SRv6 Service SID as a whole in either the SRv6 Services TLVs or | |||
the encoding of only the common part of the SRv6 SID (e.g., Locator) | the encoding of only the common part of the SRv6 SID (e.g., Locator) | |||
in the SRv6 Services TLVs and encoding the variable (e.g., Function | in the SRv6 Services TLVs and encoding the variable (e.g., Function | |||
or Argument parts) in the existing label fields specific to that | or Argument parts) in the existing label fields specific to that | |||
service encoding. This later form of encoding is referred to as the | service encoding. This later form of encoding is referred to as the | |||
Transposition Scheme where the SRv6 SID Structure Sub-Sub-TLV | Transposition Scheme, where the SRv6 SID Structure Sub-Sub-TLV | |||
describes the sizes of the parts of the SRv6 SID and also indicates | describes the sizes of the parts of the SRv6 SID and also indicates | |||
the offset of the variable part along with its length in SRv6 SID | the offset of the variable part along with its length in the SRv6 SID | |||
value. The use of the Transposition Scheme is RECOMMENDED for the | value. The use of the Transposition Scheme is RECOMMENDED for the | |||
specific service encodings that allow it as described further in | specific service encodings that allow it, as described further in | |||
Section 5 and Section 6. | Sections 5 and 6. | |||
As an example, for the EVPN VPWS service prefix described further in | As an example, for the EVPN VPWS service prefix described further in | |||
Section 6.1.2, the Function part of the SRv6 SID is encoded in the | Section 6.1.2, the Function part of the SRv6 SID is encoded in the | |||
MPLS Label field of the NLRI and the SID value in the SRv6 Services | MPLS Label field of the NLRI, and the SID value in the SRv6 Services | |||
TLV carries only the Locator part with the SRv6 SID Structure Sub- | TLV carries only the Locator part with the SRv6 SID Structure Sub- | |||
Sub-TLV. The SRv6 SID Structure Sub-Sub-TLV defines the lengths of | Sub-TLV. The SRv6 SID Structure Sub-Sub-TLV defines the lengths of | |||
Locator Block, Locator Node, and Function parts (Arguments are not | Locator Block, Locator Node, and Function parts (Arguments are not | |||
applicable for the End.DX2 behavior). Transposition Offset indicates | applicable for the End.DX2 behavior). Transposition Offset indicates | |||
the bit position and Transposition Length indicates the number of | the bit position, and Transposition Length indicates the number of | |||
bits that are being taken out of the SID and put into the label | bits that are being taken out of the SID and put into the label | |||
field. | field. | |||
In yet another example, for the EVPN Ethernet A-D per Ethernet | In yet another example, for the EVPN Ethernet Auto-Discovery (A-D) | |||
Segment (ES) route described further in Section 6.1.1, only the | per Ethernet Segment (ES) route described further in Section 6.1.1, | |||
Argument of the SID needs to be signaled. This Argument part of the | only the Argument of the SID needs to be signaled. This Argument | |||
SRv6 SID MAY be transposed in the Ethernet Segment Identifier (ESI) | part of the SRv6 SID MAY be transposed in the Ethernet Segment | |||
Label field of the ESI Label Extended Community and the SID value in | Identifier (ESI) Label field of the ESI Label extended community, and | |||
the SRv6 Services TLV is set to 0 along with the inclusion of SRv6 | the SID value in the SRv6 Services TLV is set to 0 along with the | |||
SID Structure Sub-Sub-TLV. The SRv6 SID Structure Sub-Sub-TLV | inclusion of the SRv6 SID Structure Sub-Sub-TLV. The SRv6 SID | |||
defines the lengths of Locator Block, Locator Node, Function and | Structure Sub-Sub-TLV defines the lengths of Locator Block, Locator | |||
Argument parts. The offset and length of the Argument part SID value | Node, Function, and Argument parts. The offset and length of the | |||
moved to label field is set in transposition offset and length of SID | Argument part SID value moved to the label field is set in | |||
structure TLV. The receiving router is then able to put together the | transposition offset and length of the SID Structure TLV. The | |||
entire SRv6 Service SID (e.g., for the End.DT2M behavior) placing the | receiving router is then able to put together the entire SRv6 Service | |||
label value received in the ESI Label field of the Ethernet A-D per | SID (e.g., for the End.DT2M behavior), placing the label value | |||
ES route into the correct transposition offset and length in the SRv6 | received in the ESI Label field of the Ethernet A-D per ES route into | |||
SID with the End.DT2M behavior received for an EVPN Route Type 3 | the correct transposition offset and length in the SRv6 SID with the | |||
value. | End.DT2M behavior received for an EVPN Route Type 3 value. | |||
5. BGP based L3 Service over SRv6 | 5. BGP-Based L3 Service over SRv6 | |||
BGP egress nodes (egress PEs) advertise a set of reachable prefixes. | BGP egress nodes (egress PEs) advertise a set of reachable prefixes. | |||
Standard BGP update propagation schemes [RFC4271], which may make use | Standard BGP update propagation schemes [RFC4271], which may make use | |||
of route reflectors [RFC4456], are used to propagate these prefixes. | of route reflectors [RFC4456], are used to propagate these prefixes. | |||
BGP ingress nodes (ingress PEs) receive these advertisements and may | BGP ingress nodes (ingress PEs) receive these advertisements and may | |||
add the prefix to the RIB in an appropriate VRF. | add the prefix to the RIB in an appropriate VRF. | |||
Egress PEs which supports SRv6 based L3 services advertises overlay | Egress PEs that support SRv6-based L3 services advertise overlay | |||
service prefixes along with a Service SID enclosed in an SRv6 L3 | service prefixes along with a Service SID enclosed in an SRv6 L3 | |||
Service TLV within the BGP Prefix-SID Attribute. This TLV serves two | Service TLV within the BGP Prefix-SID attribute. This TLV serves two | |||
purposes - first, it indicates that the egress PE supports SRv6 | purposes -- first, it indicates that the egress PE supports SRv6 | |||
overlay and the BGP ingress PE receiving this route MUST perform IPv6 | overlay, and the BGP ingress PE receiving this route MUST perform | |||
encapsulation and insert an SRH [RFC8754] when required; second, it | IPv6 encapsulation and insert an SRH [RFC8754] when required; second, | |||
indicates the value of the Service SID to be used in the | it indicates the value of the Service SID to be used in the | |||
encapsulation. | encapsulation. | |||
The Service SID thus signaled only has local significance at the | Thus, the Service SID signaled only has local significance at the | |||
egress PE, where it may be allocated or configured on a per-CE or | egress PE, where it may be allocated or configured on a per-Customer- | |||
per-VRF basis. In practice, the SID may encode a cross-connect to a | Edge (CE) or per-VRF basis. In practice, the SID may encode a cross- | |||
specific Address Family table (End.DT) or next-hop/interface (End.DX) | connect to a specific address family table (End.DT) or next hop / | |||
as defined in [RFC8986]. | interface (End.DX), as defined in [RFC8986]. | |||
The SRv6 Service SID SHOULD be routable (refer section 3.3 of | The SRv6 Service SID SHOULD be routable (refer to Section 3.3 of | |||
[RFC8986]) within the AS of the egress PE and serves the dual purpose | [RFC8986]) within the Autonomous System (AS) of the egress PE and | |||
of providing reachability between ingress PE and egress PE while also | serves the dual purpose of providing reachability between ingress PE | |||
encoding the SRv6 Endpoint behavior. | and egress PE while also encoding the SRv6 Endpoint behavior. | |||
When steering for SRv6 services is based on shortest path forwarding | When steering for SRv6 services is based on shortest path forwarding | |||
(e.g., best-effort or IGP Flexible Algorithm | (e.g., best effort or IGP Flexible Algorithm [LSR-FLEX-ALGO]) to the | |||
[I-D.ietf-lsr-flex-algo]) to the egress PE, the ingress PE | egress PE, the ingress PE encapsulates the IPv4 or IPv6 customer | |||
encapsulates the IPv4 or IPv6 customer packet in an outer IPv6 header | packet in an outer IPv6 header (using H.Encaps or H.Encaps.Red | |||
(using H.Encaps or H.Encaps.Red flavors specified in [RFC8986]) where | flavors specified in [RFC8986]), where the destination address is the | |||
the destination address is the SRv6 Service SID associated with the | SRv6 Service SID associated with the related BGP route update. | |||
related BGP route update. Therefore, the ingress PE MUST perform | Therefore, the ingress PE MUST perform a resolvability check for the | |||
resolvability check for the SRv6 Service SID before considering the | SRv6 Service SID before considering the received prefix for the BGP | |||
received prefix for the BGP best path computation. The resolvability | best path computation. The resolvability is evaluated, as per | |||
is evaluated as per [RFC4271]. If the SRv6 SID is reachable via more | [RFC4271]. If the SRv6 SID is reachable via more than one forwarding | |||
than one forwarding table, local policy is used to determine which | table, local policy is used to determine which table to use. The | |||
table to use. The result of an SRv6 Service SID resolvability (e.g., | result of an SRv6 Service SID resolvability (e.g., when provided via | |||
when provided via IGP Flexible Algorithm) can be ignored if the | IGP Flexible Algorithm) can be ignored if the ingress PE has a local | |||
ingress PE has a local policy that allows an alternate steering | policy that allows an alternate steering mechanism to reach the | |||
mechanism to reach the egress PE. The details of such steering | egress PE. The details of such steering mechanisms are outside the | |||
mechanisms are outside the scope of this document. | scope of this document. | |||
For service over SRv6 core, the egress PE sets the next-hop to one of | For service over SRv6 core, the egress PE sets the next hop to one of | |||
its IPv6 addresses. Such an address MAY be covered by the SRv6 | its IPv6 addresses. Such an address MAY be covered by the SRv6 | |||
Locator from which the SRv6 Service SID is allocated. The next-hop | Locator from which the SRv6 Service SID is allocated. The next hop | |||
is used for tracking the reachability of the egress PE based on | is used for tracking the reachability of the egress PE based on | |||
existing BGP procedures. | existing BGP procedures. | |||
When the BGP route is received at an ingress PE is colored with a | When the BGP route is received at an ingress PE is colored with a | |||
Color Extended community and a valid SRv6 Policy is available, the | Color Extended Community and a valid SRv6 Policy is available, the | |||
steering for service flows is performed as described in Section 8 of | steering for service flows is performed, as described in Section 8 of | |||
[I-D.ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy]. When the ingress PE | [IGMP-MLD-EVPN]. When the ingress PE determines (with the help of | |||
determines (with the help of SRv6 SID Structure) that the Service SID | the SRv6 SID Structure) that the Service SID belongs to the same SRv6 | |||
belongs to the same SRv6 Locator as the last SRv6 SID (of the egress | Locator as the last SRv6 SID (of the egress PE) in the SR Policy | |||
PE) in the SR Policy segment list, it MAY exclude that last SRv6 SID | segment list, it MAY exclude that last SRv6 SID when steering the | |||
when steering the service flow. For example, the effective segment | service flow. For example, the effective segment list of the SRv6 | |||
list of the SRv6 Policy associated with SID list <S1, S2, S3> would | Policy associated with SID list <S1, S2, S3> would be <S1, S2, S3- | |||
be <S1, S2, S3-Service-SID>. | Service-SID>. | |||
5.1. IPv4 VPN Over SRv6 Core | 5.1. IPv4 VPN over SRv6 Core | |||
The MP_REACH_NLRI over SRv6 core is encoded according to IPv4 VPN | The MP_REACH_NLRI over SRv6 core is encoded according to IPv4 VPN | |||
Over IPv6 Core defined in [RFC8950]. | over IPv6 core defined in [RFC8950]. | |||
Label field of IPv4-VPN NLRI is encoded as specified in [RFC8277] | The label field of IPv4-VPN NLRI is encoded as specified in [RFC8277] | |||
with the 20-bit Label Value set to the whole or a portion of the | with the 20-bit Label Value set to the whole or a portion of the | |||
Function part of the SRv6 SID when the Transposition Scheme of | Function part of the SRv6 SID when the Transposition Scheme of | |||
encoding (Section 4) is used and otherwise set to Implicit NULL. | encoding (Section 4) is used; otherwise, it is set to Implicit NULL. | |||
When using the Transposition Scheme, the Transposition Length MUST be | When using the Transposition Scheme, the Transposition Length MUST be | |||
less than or equal to 20 and less than or equal to the Function | less than or equal to 20 and less than or equal to the FL. | |||
Length. | ||||
SRv6 Service SID is encoded as part of the SRv6 L3 Service TLV. The | The SRv6 Service SID is encoded as part of the SRv6 L3 Service TLV. | |||
SRv6 Endpoint behavior SHOULD be one of these: End.DX4, End.DT4, | The SRv6 Endpoint behavior SHOULD be one of these: End.DX4, End.DT4, | |||
End.DT46. | or End.DT46. | |||
5.2. IPv6 VPN Over SRv6 Core | 5.2. IPv6 VPN over SRv6 Core | |||
The MP_REACH_NLRI over SRv6 core is encoded according to IPv6 VPN | The MP_REACH_NLRI over SRv6 core is encoded according to IPv6 VPN | |||
over IPv6 Core is defined in [RFC4659]. | over IPv6 core, as defined in [RFC4659]. | |||
Label field of the IPv6-VPN NLRI is encoded as specified in [RFC8277] | The label field of the IPv6-VPN NLRI is encoded as specified in | |||
with the 20-bit Label Value set to the whole or a portion of the | [RFC8277] with the 20-bit Label Value set to the whole or a portion | |||
Function part of the SRv6 SID when the Transposition Scheme of | of the Function part of the SRv6 SID when the Transposition Scheme of | |||
encoding (Section 4) is used and otherwise set to Implicit NULL. | encoding (Section 4) is used; otherwise, it is set to Implicit NULL. | |||
When using the Transposition Scheme, the Transposition Length MUST be | When using the Transposition Scheme, the Transposition Length MUST be | |||
less than or equal to 20 and less than or equal to the Function | less than or equal to 20 and less than or equal to the FL. | |||
Length. | ||||
SRv6 Service SID is encoded as part of the SRv6 L3 Service TLV. The | The SRv6 Service SID is encoded as part of the SRv6 L3 Service TLV. | |||
SRv6 Endpoint behavior SHOULD be one of these: End.DX6, End.DT6, | The SRv6 Endpoint behavior SHOULD be one of these: End.DX6, End.DT6, | |||
End.DT46. | or End.DT46. | |||
5.3. Global IPv4 over SRv6 Core | 5.3. Global IPv4 over SRv6 Core | |||
The MP_REACH_NLRI over SRv6 core is encoded according to IPv4 over | The MP_REACH_NLRI over SRv6 core is encoded according to IPv4 over | |||
IPv6 Core is defined in [RFC8950]. | IPv6 core, as defined in [RFC8950]. | |||
SRv6 Service SID is encoded as part of the SRv6 L3 Service TLV. The | SRv6 Service SID is encoded as part of the SRv6 L3 Service TLV. The | |||
SRv6 Endpoint behavior SHOULD be one of these: End.DX4, End.DT4, | SRv6 Endpoint behavior SHOULD be one of these: End.DX4, End.DT4, or | |||
End.DT46. | End.DT46. | |||
5.4. Global IPv6 over SRv6 Core | 5.4. Global IPv6 over SRv6 Core | |||
The MP_REACH_NLRI over SRv6 core is encoded according to [RFC2545] | The MP_REACH_NLRI over SRv6 core is encoded according to [RFC2545]. | |||
SRv6 Service SID is encoded as part of the SRv6 L3 Service TLV. The | The SRv6 Service SID is encoded as part of the SRv6 L3 Service TLV. | |||
SRv6 Endpoint behavior SHOULD be one of these: End.DX6, End.DT6, | The SRv6 Endpoint behavior SHOULD be one of these: End.DX6, End.DT6, | |||
End.DT46. | or End.DT46. | |||
6. BGP based Ethernet VPN (EVPN) over SRv6 | 6. BGP-Based Ethernet VPN (EVPN) over SRv6 | |||
[RFC7432] provides an extendable method of building an Ethernet VPN | [RFC7432] provides an extendable method of building an EVPN overlay. | |||
(EVPN) overlay. It primarily focuses on MPLS based EVPNs and | It primarily focuses on MPLS-based EVPNs, and [RFC8365] extends to | |||
[RFC8365] extends to IP-based EVPN overlays. [RFC7432] defines Route | IP-based EVPN overlays. [RFC7432] defines Route Types 1, 2, and 3, | |||
Types 1, 2, and 3 which carry prefixes and MPLS Label fields; the | which carry prefixes and MPLS Label fields; the Label fields have a | |||
Label fields have a specific use for MPLS encapsulation of EVPN | specific use for MPLS encapsulation of EVPN traffic. Route Type 5 | |||
traffic. Route Type 5 carrying MPLS label information (and thus | carrying MPLS label information (and thus encapsulation information) | |||
encapsulation information) for EVPN is defined in [RFC9136]. Route | for an EVPN is defined in [RFC9136]. Route Types 6, 7, and 8 are | |||
Types 6, 7, and 8 are defined in [I-D.ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy]. | defined in [RFC9251]. | |||
o Ethernet Auto-discovery Route (Route Type 1) | * Ethernet Auto-Discovery (A-D) route (Route Type 1) | |||
o MAC/IP Advertisement Route (Route Type 2) | * MAC/IP Advertisement route (Route Type 2) | |||
o Inclusive Multicast Ethernet Tag Route (Route Type 3) | * Inclusive Multicast Ethernet Tag route (Route Type 3) | |||
o Ethernet Segment route (Route Type 4) | * Ethernet Segment route (Route Type 4) | |||
o IP prefix route (Route Type 5) | * IP Prefix route (Route Type 5) | |||
o Selective Multicast Ethernet Tag route (Route Type 6) | * Selective Multicast Ethernet Tag route (Route Type 6) | |||
o Multicast Membership Report Synch route (Route Type 7) | * Multicast Membership Report Synch route (Route Type 7) | |||
o Multicast Leave Synch route (Route Type 8) | ||||
* Multicast Leave Synch route (Route Type 8) | ||||
The specifications for other EVPN Route Types are outside the scope | The specifications for other EVPN Route Types are outside the scope | |||
of this document. | of this document. | |||
To support SRv6 based EVPN overlays, one or more SRv6 Service SIDs | To support SRv6-based EVPN overlays, one or more SRv6 Service SIDs | |||
are advertised with Route Type 1, 2, 3, and 5. The SRv6 Service | are advertised with Route Types 1, 2, 3, and 5. The SRv6 Service | |||
SID(s) per Route Type are advertised in SRv6 L3/L2 Service TLVs | SID(s) per Route Type is advertised in SRv6 L3/L2 Service TLVs within | |||
within the BGP Prefix-SID Attribute. Signaling of SRv6 Service | the BGP Prefix-SID attribute. Signaling of the SRv6 Service SID(s) | |||
SID(s) serves two purposes - first, it indicates that the BGP egress | serves two purposes -- first, it indicates that the BGP egress device | |||
device supports SRv6 overlay and the BGP ingress device receiving | supports SRv6 overlay, and the BGP ingress device receiving this | |||
this route MUST perform IPv6 encapsulation and insert an SRH | route MUST perform IPv6 encapsulation and insert an SRH [RFC8754] | |||
[RFC8754] when required; second, it indicates the value of the | when required; second, it indicates the value of the Service SID(s) | |||
Service SID(s) to be used in the encapsulation. | to be used in the encapsulation. | |||
The SRv6 Service SID SHOULD be routable (refer section 3.3 of | The SRv6 Service SID SHOULD be routable (refer to Section 3.3 of | |||
[RFC8986]) within the AS of the egress PE and serves the dual purpose | [RFC8986]) within the AS of the egress PE and serves the dual purpose | |||
of providing reachability between ingress PE and egress PE while also | of providing reachability between the ingress PE and egress PE while | |||
encoding the SRv6 Endpoint behavior. | also encoding the SRv6 Endpoint behavior. | |||
When steering for SRv6 services is based on shortest path forwarding | When steering for SRv6 services is based on shortest path forwarding | |||
(e.g., best-effort or IGP Flexible Algorithm | (e.g., best effort or IGP Flexible Algorithm [LSR-FLEX-ALGO]) to the | |||
[I-D.ietf-lsr-flex-algo]) to the egress PE, the ingress PE | egress PE, the ingress PE encapsulates the customer Layer 2 Ethernet | |||
encapsulates the customer Layer 2 Ethernet packet in an outer IPv6 | packet in an outer IPv6 header (using H.Encaps.L2 or H.Encaps.L2.Red | |||
header (using H.Encaps.L2 or H.Encaps.L2.Red flavors specified in | flavors specified in [RFC8986]) where the destination address is the | |||
[RFC8986]) where the destination address is the SRv6 Service SID | SRv6 Service SID associated with the related BGP route update. | |||
associated with the related BGP route update. Therefore, the ingress | Therefore, the ingress PE MUST perform a resolvability check for the | |||
PE MUST perform resolvability check for the SRv6 Service SID before | SRv6 Service SID before considering the received prefix for the BGP | |||
considering the received prefix for the BGP best path computation. | best path computation. The resolvability is evaluated as per | |||
The resolvability is evaluated as per [RFC4271]. If the SRv6 SID is | [RFC4271]. If the SRv6 SID is reachable via more than one forwarding | |||
reachable via more than one forwarding table, local policy is used to | table, local policy is used to determine which table to use. The | |||
determine which table to use. The result of an SRv6 Service SID | result of an SRv6 Service SID resolvability (e.g., when provided via | |||
resolvability (e.g., when provided via IGP Flexible Algorithm) can be | IGP Flexible Algorithm) can be ignored if the ingress PE has a local | |||
ignored if the ingress PE has a local policy that allows an alternate | policy that allows an alternate steering mechanism to reach the | |||
steering mechanism to reach the egress PE. The details of such | egress PE. The details of such steering mechanisms are outside the | |||
steering mechanisms are outside the scope of this document. | scope of this document. | |||
For service over SRv6 core, the egress PE sets the next-hop to one of | For service over SRv6 core, the egress PE sets the next hop to one of | |||
its IPv6 addresses. Such an address MAY be covered by the SRv6 | its IPv6 addresses. Such an address MAY be covered by the SRv6 | |||
Locator from which the SRv6 Service SID is allocated. The next-hop | Locator from which the SRv6 Service SID is allocated. The next hop | |||
is used for tracking the reachability of the egress PE based on | is used for tracking the reachability of the egress PE based on | |||
existing BGP procedures. | existing BGP procedures. | |||
When the BGP route is received at an ingress PE is colored with a | When the BGP route is received at an ingress PE is colored with a | |||
Color Extended community and a valid SRv6 Policy is available, the | Color Extended Community and a valid SRv6 Policy is available, the | |||
steering for service flows is performed as described in Section 8 of | steering for service flows is performed as described in Section 8 of | |||
[I-D.ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy]. When the ingress PE | [IGMP-MLD-EVPN]. When the ingress PE determines (with the help of | |||
determines (with the help of SRv6 SID Structure) that the Service SID | the SRv6 SID Structure) that the Service SID belongs to the same SRv6 | |||
belongs to the same SRv6 Locator as the last SRv6 SID (of the egress | Locator as the last SRv6 SID (of the egress PE) in the SR Policy | |||
PE) in the SR Policy segment list, it MAY exclude that last SRv6 SID | segment list, it MAY exclude that last SRv6 SID when steering the | |||
when steering the service flow. For example, the effective segment | service flow. For example, the effective segment list of the SRv6 | |||
list of the SRv6 Policy associated with SID list <S1, S2, S3> would | Policy associated with SID list <S1, S2, S3> would be <S1, S2, S3- | |||
be <S1, S2, S3-Service-SID>. | Service-SID>. | |||
6.1. Ethernet Auto-discovery Route over SRv6 Core | 6.1. Ethernet Auto-Discovery Route over SRv6 Core | |||
Ethernet Auto-Discovery (A-D) routes are Route Type 1 defined in | Ethernet A-D routes are Route Type 1, as defined in [RFC7432], and | |||
[RFC7432] and may be used to achieve split-horizon filtering, fast | may be used to achieve split-horizon filtering, fast convergence, and | |||
convergence, and aliasing. EVPN Route Type 1 is also used in EVPN- | aliasing. EVPN Route Type 1 is also used in EVPN-VPWS as well as in | |||
VPWS as well as in EVPN flexible cross-connect; mainly used to | EVPN-flexible cross-connect, mainly to advertise point-to-point | |||
advertise point-to-point services ID. | services ID. | |||
As a reminder, EVPN Route Type 1 is encoded as follows: | As a reminder, EVPN Route Type 1 is encoded as follows: | |||
+---------------------------------------+ | +-----------------------------------------+ | |||
| RD (8 octets) | | | RD (8 octets) | | |||
+---------------------------------------+ | +-----------------------------------------+ | |||
|Ethernet Segment Identifier (10 octets)| | | Ethernet Segment Identifier (10 octets)| | |||
+---------------------------------------+ | +-----------------------------------------+ | |||
| Ethernet Tag ID (4 octets) | | | Ethernet Tag ID (4 octets) | | |||
+---------------------------------------+ | +-----------------------------------------+ | |||
| MPLS label (3 octets) | | | MPLS label (3 octets) | | |||
+---------------------------------------+ | +-----------------------------------------+ | |||
Figure 6: EVPN Route Type 1 | Figure 6: EVPN Route Type 1 | |||
6.1.1. Ethernet A-D per ES Route | 6.1.1. Ethernet A-D per ES Route | |||
Ethernet A-D per ES route NLRI encoding over SRv6 core is as per | Ethernet A-D per ES route NLRI encoding over SRv6 core is as per | |||
[RFC7432]. | [RFC7432]. | |||
The 24-bit ESI label field of the ESI label extended community | The 24-bit ESI Label field of the ESI Label extended community | |||
carries the whole or a portion of the Argument part of the SRv6 SID | carries the whole or a portion of the Argument part of the SRv6 SID | |||
when the ESI filtering approach is used along with the Transposition | when the ESI filtering approach is used along with the Transposition | |||
Scheme of encoding (Section 4) and otherwise set to Implicit NULL | Scheme of encoding (Section 4); otherwise, it is set to the Implicit | |||
value. In either case, the value is set in the high order 20 bits | NULL value. In either case, the value is set in the high order 20 | |||
(e.g., as 0x000030 in the case of Implicit NULL). When using the | bits (e.g., as 0x000030 in the case of Implicit NULL). When using | |||
Transposition Scheme, the Transposition Length MUST be less than or | the Transposition Scheme, the Transposition Length MUST be less than | |||
equal to 24 and less than or equal to the Argument Length. | or equal to 24 and less than or equal to the AL. | |||
A Service SID enclosed in an SRv6 L2 Service TLV within the BGP | A Service SID enclosed in an SRv6 L2 Service TLV within the BGP | |||
Prefix-SID attribute is advertised along with the A-D route. The | Prefix-SID attribute is advertised along with the A-D route. The | |||
SRv6 Endpoint behavior SHOULD be End.DT2M. When the ESI filtering | SRv6 Endpoint behavior SHOULD be End.DT2M. When the ESI filtering | |||
approach is used, the Service SID is used to signal Arg.FE2 SID | approach is used, the Service SID is used to signal the Arg.FE2 SID | |||
Argument for applicable End.DT2M behavior [RFC8986]. When the local- | Argument for applicable End.DT2M behavior [RFC8986]. When the local- | |||
bias approach [RFC8365] is used, the Service SID MAY be of value 0. | bias approach [RFC8365] is used, the Service SID MAY be of value 0. | |||
6.1.2. Ethernet A-D per EVI Route | 6.1.2. Ethernet A-D per EVI Route | |||
Ethernet A-D per EVI route NLRI encoding over SRv6 core is similar to | Ethernet A-D per EVPN Instance (EVI) route NLRI encoding over SRv6 | |||
[RFC7432] and [RFC8214] with the following change: | core is similar to what is described in [RFC7432] and [RFC8214] with | |||
the following change: | ||||
o MPLS Label: 24-bit field carries the whole or a portion of the | MPLS Label: | |||
Function part of the SRv6 SID when the Transposition Scheme of | The 24-bit field carries the whole or a portion of the Function | |||
encoding (Section 4) is used and otherwise set to Implicit NULL | part of the SRv6 SID when the Transposition Scheme of encoding | |||
(Section 4) is used; otherwise, it is set to the Implicit NULL | ||||
value. In either case, the value is set in the high order 20 bits | value. In either case, the value is set in the high order 20 bits | |||
(e.g., as 0x000030 in the case of Implicit NULL). When using the | (e.g., as 0x000030 in the case of Implicit NULL). When using the | |||
Transposition Scheme, the Transposition Length MUST be less than | Transposition Scheme, the Transposition Length MUST be less than | |||
or equal to 24 and less than or equal to the Function Length. | or equal to 24 and less than or equal to the FL. | |||
A Service SID enclosed in an SRv6 L2 Service TLV within the BGP | A Service SID enclosed in an SRv6 L2 Service TLV within the BGP | |||
Prefix-SID attribute is advertised along with the A-D route. The | Prefix-SID attribute is advertised along with the A-D route. The | |||
SRv6 Endpoint behavior SHOULD be one of these: End.DX2, End.DX2V, | SRv6 Endpoint behavior SHOULD be one of these: End.DX2, End.DX2V, or | |||
End.DT2U. | End.DT2U. | |||
6.2. MAC/IP Advertisement Route over SRv6 Core | 6.2. MAC/IP Advertisement Route over SRv6 Core | |||
EVPN Route Type 2 is used to advertise unicast traffic MAC+IP address | EVPN Route Type 2 is used to advertise unicast traffic Media Access | |||
reachability through MP-BGP to all other PEs in a given EVPN | Control (MAC) + IP address reachability through MP-BGP to all other | |||
instance. | PEs in a given EVPN instance. | |||
As a reminder, EVPN Route Type 2 is encoded as follows: | As a reminder, EVPN Route Type 2 is encoded as follows: | |||
+---------------------------------------+ | +-----------------------------------------+ | |||
| RD (8 octets) | | | RD (8 octets) | | |||
+---------------------------------------+ | +-----------------------------------------+ | |||
|Ethernet Segment Identifier (10 octets)| | | Ethernet Segment Identifier (10 octets)| | |||
+---------------------------------------+ | +-----------------------------------------+ | |||
| Ethernet Tag ID (4 octets) | | | Ethernet Tag ID (4 octets) | | |||
+---------------------------------------+ | +-----------------------------------------+ | |||
| MAC Address Length (1 octet) | | | MAC Address Length (1 octet) | | |||
+---------------------------------------+ | +-----------------------------------------+ | |||
| MAC Address (6 octets) | | | MAC Address (6 octets) | | |||
+---------------------------------------+ | +-----------------------------------------+ | |||
| IP Address Length (1 octet) | | | IP Address Length (1 octet) | | |||
+---------------------------------------+ | +-----------------------------------------+ | |||
| IP Address (0, 4, or 16 octets) | | | IP Address (0, 4, or 16 octets) | | |||
+---------------------------------------+ | +-----------------------------------------+ | |||
| MPLS Label1 (3 octets) | | | MPLS Label1 (3 octets) | | |||
+---------------------------------------+ | +-----------------------------------------+ | |||
| MPLS Label2 (0 or 3 octets) | | | MPLS Label2 (0 or 3 octets) | | |||
+---------------------------------------+ | +-----------------------------------------+ | |||
Figure 7: EVPN Route Type 2 | Figure 7: EVPN Route Type 2 | |||
NLRI encoding over SRv6 core is similar to [RFC7432] with the | NLRI encoding over SRv6 core is similar to what is described in | |||
following changes: | [RFC7432] with the following changes: | |||
o MPLS Label1: Is associated with the SRv6 L2 Service TLV. This | MPLS Label1: | |||
24-bit field carries the whole or a portion of the Function part | This is associated with the SRv6 L2 Service TLV. This 24-bit | |||
of the SRv6 SID when the Transposition Scheme of encoding | field carries the whole or a portion of the Function part of the | |||
(Section 4) is used and otherwise set to Implicit NULL value. In | SRv6 SID when the Transposition Scheme of encoding (Section 4) is | |||
either case, the value is set in the high order 20 bits (e.g., as | used; otherwise, it is set to the Implicit NULL value. In either | |||
case, the value is set in the high order 20 bits (e.g., as | ||||
0x000030 in the case of Implicit NULL). When using the | 0x000030 in the case of Implicit NULL). When using the | |||
Transposition Scheme, the Transposition Length MUST be less than | Transposition Scheme, the Transposition Length MUST be less than | |||
or equal to 24 and less than or equal to the Function Length. | or equal to 24 and less than or equal to the FL. | |||
o MPLS Label2: Is associated with the SRv6 L3 Service TLV. This | MPLS Label2: | |||
24-bit field carries the whole or a portion of the Function part | This is associated with the SRv6 L3 Service TLV. This 24-bit | |||
of the SRv6 SID when the Transposition Scheme of encoding | field carries the whole or a portion of the Function part of the | |||
(Section 4) is used and otherwise set to Implicit NULL value. In | SRv6 SID when the Transposition Scheme of encoding (Section 4) is | |||
either case, the value is set in the high order 20 bits (e.g., as | used; otherwise, it is set to the Implicit NULL value. In either | |||
case, the value is set in the high order 20 bits (e.g., as | ||||
0x000030 in the case of Implicit NULL). When using the | 0x000030 in the case of Implicit NULL). When using the | |||
Transposition Scheme, the Transposition Length MUST be less than | Transposition Scheme, the Transposition Length MUST be less than | |||
or equal to 24 and less than or equal to the Function Length. | or equal to 24 and less than or equal to the FL. | |||
Service SIDs enclosed in SRv6 L2 Service TLV and optionally in SRv6 | Service SIDs enclosed in the SRv6 L2 Service TLV and optionally in | |||
L3 Service TLV within the BGP Prefix-SID attribute is advertised | the SRv6 L3 Service TLV within the BGP Prefix-SID attribute are | |||
along with the MAC/IP Advertisement route. | advertised along with the MAC/IP Advertisement route. | |||
Described below are different types of Route Type 2 advertisements. | Described below are different types of Route Type 2 advertisements. | |||
6.2.1. MAC/IP Advertisement Route with MAC Only | 6.2.1. MAC/IP Advertisement Route with MAC Only | |||
o MPLS Label1: Is associated with the SRv6 L2 Service TLV. This | MPLS Label1: | |||
24-bit field carries the whole or a portion of the Function part | This is associated with the SRv6 L2 Service TLV. This 24-bit | |||
of the SRv6 SID when the Transposition Scheme of encoding | field carries the whole or a portion of the Function part of the | |||
(Section 4) is used and otherwise set to Implicit NULL value. In | SRv6 SID when the Transposition Scheme of encoding (Section 4) is | |||
either case, the value is set in the high order 20 bits (e.g., as | used; otherwise, it is set to the Implicit NULL value. In either | |||
case, the value is set in the high order 20 bits (e.g., as | ||||
0x000030 in the case of Implicit NULL). When using the | 0x000030 in the case of Implicit NULL). When using the | |||
Transposition Scheme, the Transposition Length MUST be less than | Transposition Scheme, the Transposition Length MUST be less than | |||
or equal to 24 and less than or equal to the Function Length. | or equal to 24 and less than or equal to the FL. | |||
A Service SID enclosed in an SRv6 L2 Service TLV within the BGP | A Service SID enclosed in an SRv6 L2 Service TLV within the BGP | |||
Prefix-SID attribute is advertised along with the route. The SRv6 | Prefix-SID attribute is advertised along with the route. The SRv6 | |||
Endpoint behavior SHOULD be one of these: End.DX2, End.DT2U. | Endpoint behavior SHOULD be one of these: End.DX2 or End.DT2U. | |||
6.2.2. MAC/IP Advertisement Route with MAC+IP | 6.2.2. MAC/IP Advertisement Route with MAC+IP | |||
o MPLS Label1: Is associated with the SRv6 L2 Service TLV. This | MPLS Label1: | |||
24-bit field carries the whole or a portion of the Function part | This is associated with the SRv6 L2 Service TLV. This 24-bit | |||
of the SRv6 SID when the Transposition Scheme of encoding | field carries the whole or a portion of the Function part of the | |||
(Section 4) is used and otherwise set to Implicit NULL value. In | SRv6 SID when the Transposition Scheme of encoding (Section 4) is | |||
either case, the value is set in the high order 20 bits (e.g., as | used; otherwise, it is set to the Implicit NULL value. In either | |||
case, the value is set in the high order 20 bits (e.g., as | ||||
0x000030 in the case of Implicit NULL). When using the | 0x000030 in the case of Implicit NULL). When using the | |||
Transposition Scheme, the Transposition Length MUST be less than | Transposition Scheme, the Transposition Length MUST be less than | |||
or equal to 24 and less than or equal to the Function Length. | or equal to 24 and less than or equal to the FL. | |||
o MPLS Label2: Is associated with the SRv6 L3 Service TLV. This | MPLS Label2: | |||
24-bit field carries the whole or a portion of the Function part | This is associated with the SRv6 L3 Service TLV. This 24-bit | |||
of the SRv6 SID when the Transposition Scheme of encoding | field carries the whole or a portion of the Function part of the | |||
(Section 4) is used and otherwise set to Implicit NULL value. In | SRv6 SID when the Transposition Scheme of encoding (Section 4) is | |||
either case, the value is set in the high order 20 bits (e.g., as | used; otherwise, it is set to the Implicit NULL value. In either | |||
case, the value is set in the high order 20 bits (e.g., as | ||||
0x000030 in the case of Implicit NULL). When using the | 0x000030 in the case of Implicit NULL). When using the | |||
Transposition Scheme, the Transposition Length MUST be less than | Transposition Scheme, the Transposition Length MUST be less than | |||
or equal to 24 and less than or equal to the Function Length. | or equal to 24 and less than or equal to the FL. | |||
An L2 Service SID enclosed in an SRv6 L2 Service TLV within the BGP | An L2 Service SID enclosed in an SRv6 L2 Service TLV within the BGP | |||
Prefix-SID attribute is advertised along with the route. In | Prefix-SID attribute is advertised along with the route. In | |||
addition, an L3 Service SID enclosed in an SRv6 L3 Service TLV within | addition, an L3 Service SID enclosed in an SRv6 L3 Service TLV within | |||
the BGP Prefix-SID attribute MAY also be advertised along with the | the BGP Prefix-SID attribute MAY also be advertised along with the | |||
route. The SRv6 Endpoint behavior SHOULD be one of these: for the L2 | route. The SRv6 Endpoint behavior SHOULD be one of these: for the L2 | |||
Service SID - End.DX2, End.DT2U; for the L3 Service SID - End.DT46, | Service SID, End.DX2 or End.DT2U and for the L3 Service SID, | |||
End.DT4, End.DT6, End.DX4, End.DX6. | End.DT46, End.DT4, End.DT6, End.DX4, or End.DX6. | |||
6.3. Inclusive Multicast Ethernet Tag Route over SRv6 Core | 6.3. Inclusive Multicast Ethernet Tag Route over SRv6 Core | |||
EVPN Route Type 3 is used to advertise multicast traffic reachability | EVPN Route Type 3 is used to advertise multicast traffic reachability | |||
information through MP-BGP to all other PEs in a given EVPN instance. | information through MP-BGP to all other PEs in a given EVPN instance. | |||
As a reminder, EVPN Route Type 3 is encoded as follows: | As a reminder, EVPN Route Type 3 is encoded as follows: | |||
+---------------------------------------+ | +---------------------------------------+ | |||
| RD (8 octets) | | | RD (8 octets) | | |||
skipping to change at page 20, line 25 ¶ | skipping to change at line 907 ¶ | |||
| Ethernet Tag ID (4 octets) | | | Ethernet Tag ID (4 octets) | | |||
+---------------------------------------+ | +---------------------------------------+ | |||
| IP Address Length (1 octet) | | | IP Address Length (1 octet) | | |||
+---------------------------------------+ | +---------------------------------------+ | |||
| Originating Router's IP Address | | | Originating Router's IP Address | | |||
| (4 or 16 octets) | | | (4 or 16 octets) | | |||
+---------------------------------------+ | +---------------------------------------+ | |||
Figure 8: EVPN Route Type 3 | Figure 8: EVPN Route Type 3 | |||
NLRI encoding over SRv6 core is similar to [RFC7432]. | NLRI encoding over SRv6 core is similar to what is described in | |||
[RFC7432]. | ||||
PMSI Tunnel Attribute [RFC6514] is used to identify the P-tunnel used | The P-Multicast Service Interface (PMSI) Tunnel Attribute [RFC6514] | |||
for sending broadcast, unknown unicast, or multicast (BUM) traffic. | is used to identify the Provider tunnel (P-tunnel) used for sending | |||
The format of PMSI Tunnel Attribute is encoded as follows over SRv6 | Broadcast, Unknown Unicast, or Multicast (BUM) traffic. The format | |||
Core: | of the PMSI Tunnel Attribute is encoded as follows over SRv6 core: | |||
+---------------------------------------+ | +---------------------------------------+ | |||
| Flag (1 octet) | | | Flag (1 octet) | | |||
+---------------------------------------+ | +---------------------------------------+ | |||
| Tunnel Type (1 octet) | | | Tunnel Type (1 octet) | | |||
+---------------------------------------+ | +---------------------------------------+ | |||
| MPLS label (3 octet) | | | MPLS label (3 octets) | | |||
+---------------------------------------+ | +---------------------------------------+ | |||
| Tunnel Identifier (variable) | | | Tunnel Identifier (variable) | | |||
+---------------------------------------+ | +---------------------------------------+ | |||
Figure 9: PMSI Tunnel Attribute | Figure 9: PMSI Tunnel Attribute | |||
o Flag: zero value defined per [RFC7432] | Flag: | |||
This field has a value of 0, as defined per [RFC7432]. | ||||
o Tunnel Type: defined per [RFC6514] | Tunnel Type: | |||
This field is defined per [RFC6514]. | ||||
o MPLS label: This 24-bit field carries the whole or a portion of | MPLS label: | |||
the Function part of the SRv6 SID when ingress replication is used | This 24-bit field carries the whole or a portion of the Function | |||
and the Transposition Scheme of encoding (Section 4) is used and | part of the SRv6 SID when ingress replication is used and the | |||
otherwise, it is set as defined in [RFC6514]. When using the | Transposition Scheme of encoding (Section 4) is used; otherwise, | |||
Transposition Scheme, the Transposition Length MUST be less than | it is set as defined in [RFC6514]. When using the Transposition | |||
or equal to 24 and less than or equal to the Function Length. | Scheme, the Transposition Length MUST be less than or equal to 24 | |||
and less than or equal to the FL. | ||||
o Tunnel Identifier: IP address of egress PE | Tunnel Identifier: | |||
This field is the IP address of egress PE. | ||||
A Service SID enclosed in an SRv6 L2 Service TLV within the BGP | A Service SID enclosed in an SRv6 L2 Service TLV within the BGP | |||
Prefix-SID attribute is advertised along with the route. The SRv6 | Prefix-SID attribute is advertised along with the route. The SRv6 | |||
Endpoint behavior SHOULD be End.DT2M. | Endpoint behavior SHOULD be End.DT2M. | |||
o When ESI-based filtering is used for Multi-Homing or E-Tree | * When ESI-based filtering is used for multihoming or Ethernet Tree | |||
procedures, the ESI Filtering Argument (the Arg.FE2 notation | (E-Tree) procedures, the ESI Filtering Argument (the Arg.FE2 | |||
introduced in [RFC8986]) of the Service SID carried along with | notation introduced in [RFC8986]) of the Service SID carried along | |||
EVPN Route Type 1 route SHOULD be merged with the applicable | with EVPN Route Type 1 SHOULD be merged with the applicable | |||
End.DT2M SID of Type 3 route advertised by remote PE by doing a | End.DT2M SID of Route Type 3 advertised by the remote PE by doing | |||
bit-wise logical-OR operation to create a single SID on the | a bitwise logical-OR operation to create a single SID on the | |||
ingress PE. Details of split-horizon ESI-based filtering | ingress PE. Details of split-horizon, ESI-based filtering | |||
mechanisms for multihoming are described in [RFC7432]. Details of | mechanisms for multihoming are described in [RFC7432]. Details of | |||
filtering mechanisms for Leaf-originated BUM traffic in EVPN | filtering mechanisms for Leaf-originated BUM traffic in EVPN | |||
E-Tree services are provided in [RFC8317]. | E-Tree services are provided in [RFC8317]. | |||
o When "local-bias" is used as the Multi-Homing split-horizon | * When "local-bias" is used as the multihoming split-horizon method, | |||
method, the ESI Filtering Argument SHOULD NOT be merged with the | the ESI Filtering Argument SHOULD NOT be merged with the | |||
corresponding End.DT2M SID on the ingress PE. Details of the | corresponding End.DT2M SID on the ingress PE. Details of the | |||
"local-bias" procedures are described in [RFC8365]. | local-bias procedures are described in [RFC8365]. | |||
Usage of multicast trees as P-tunnels is outside the scope of this | Usage of multicast trees as P-tunnels is outside the scope of this | |||
document. | document. | |||
6.4. Ethernet Segment Route over SRv6 Core | 6.4. Ethernet Segment Route over SRv6 Core | |||
As a reminder, an Ethernet Segment route (i.e., EVPN Route Type 4) is | As a reminder, an Ethernet Segment route (i.e., EVPN Route Type 4) is | |||
encoded as follows: | encoded as follows: | |||
+---------------------------------------+ | +---------------------------------------+ | |||
| RD (8 octets) | | | RD (8 octets) | | |||
+---------------------------------------+ | +---------------------------------------+ | |||
| Ethernet Tag ID (4 octets) | | | Ethernet Tag ID (4 octets) | | |||
+---------------------------------------+ | +---------------------------------------+ | |||
| IP Address Length (1 octet) | | | IP Address Length (1 octet) | | |||
+---------------------------------------+ | +---------------------------------------+ | |||
| Originating Router's IP Address | | | Originating Router's IP Address | | |||
| (4 or 16 octets) | | | (4 or 16 octets) | | |||
+---------------------------------------+ | +---------------------------------------+ | |||
Figure 10: EVPN Route Type 4 | Figure 10: EVPN Route Type 4 | |||
NLRI encoding over SRv6 core is similar to [RFC7432]. | NLRI encoding over SRv6 core is similar to what is described in | |||
[RFC7432]. | ||||
SRv6 Service TLVs within the BGP Prefix-SID attribute are not | SRv6 Service TLVs within the BGP Prefix-SID attribute are not | |||
advertised along with this route. The processing of the route has | advertised along with this route. The processing of the route has | |||
not changed - it remains as described in [RFC7432]. | not changed -- it remains as described in [RFC7432]. | |||
6.5. IP Prefix Route over SRv6 Core | 6.5. IP Prefix Route over SRv6 Core | |||
EVPN Route Type 5 is used to advertise IP address reachability | EVPN Route Type 5 is used to advertise IP address reachability | |||
through MP-BGP to all other PEs in a given EVPN instance. The IP | through MP-BGP to all other PEs in a given EVPN instance. The IP | |||
address may include a host IP prefix or any specific subnet. | address may include a host IP prefix or any specific subnet. | |||
As a reminder, EVPN Route Type 5 is encoded as follows: | As a reminder, EVPN Route Type 5 is encoded as follows: | |||
+---------------------------------------+ | +-----------------------------------------+ | |||
| RD (8 octets) | | | RD (8 octets) | | |||
+---------------------------------------+ | +-----------------------------------------+ | |||
|Ethernet Segment Identifier (10 octets)| | | Ethernet Segment Identifier (10 octets)| | |||
+---------------------------------------+ | +-----------------------------------------+ | |||
| Ethernet Tag ID (4 octets) | | | Ethernet Tag ID (4 octets) | | |||
+---------------------------------------+ | +-----------------------------------------+ | |||
| IP Prefix Length (1 octet) | | | IP Prefix Length (1 octet) | | |||
+---------------------------------------+ | +-----------------------------------------+ | |||
| IP Prefix (4 or 16 octets) | | | IP Prefix (4 or 16 octets) | | |||
+---------------------------------------+ | +-----------------------------------------+ | |||
| GW IP Address (4 or 16 octets) | | | GW IP Address (4 or 16 octets) | | |||
+---------------------------------------+ | +-----------------------------------------+ | |||
| MPLS Label (3 octets) | | | MPLS Label (3 octets) | | |||
+---------------------------------------+ | +-----------------------------------------+ | |||
Figure 11: EVPN Route Type 5 | Figure 11: EVPN Route Type 5 | |||
NLRI encoding over SRv6 core is similar to [RFC9136] with the | NLRI encoding over SRv6 core is similar to what is described in | |||
following change: | [RFC9136] with the following change: | |||
o MPLS Label: This 24-bit field carries the whole or a portion of | MPLS Label: | |||
the Function part of the SRv6 SID when the Transposition Scheme of | This 24-bit field carries the whole or a portion of the Function | |||
encoding (Section 4) is used and otherwise set to Implicit NULL | part of the SRv6 SID when the Transposition Scheme of encoding | |||
(Section 4) is used; otherwise, it is set to the Implicit NULL | ||||
value. In either case, the value is set in the high order 20 bits | value. In either case, the value is set in the high order 20 bits | |||
(e.g., as 0x000030 in the case of Implicit NULL). When using the | (e.g., as 0x000030 in the case of Implicit NULL). When using the | |||
Transposition Scheme, the Transposition Length MUST be less than | Transposition Scheme, the Transposition Length MUST be less than | |||
or equal to 24 and less than or equal to the Function Length. | or equal to 24 and less than or equal to the FL. | |||
SRv6 Service SID is encoded as part of the SRv6 L3 Service TLV. The | The SRv6 Service SID is encoded as part of the SRv6 L3 Service TLV. | |||
SRv6 Endpoint behavior SHOULD be one of these: End.DT4, End.DT6, | The SRv6 Endpoint behavior SHOULD be one of these: End.DT4, End.DT6, | |||
End.DT46, End.DX4, End.DX6. | End.DT46, End.DX4, or End.DX6. | |||
6.6. EVPN Multicast Routes (Route Types 6, 7, 8) over SRv6 Core | 6.6. EVPN Multicast Routes (Route Types 6, 7, and 8) over SRv6 Core | |||
These routes do not require the advertisement of SRv6 Service TLVs | These routes do not require the advertisement of SRv6 Service TLVs | |||
along with them. Similar to EVPN Route Type 4, the BGP Nexthop is | along with them. Similar to EVPN Route Type 4, the BGP next hop is | |||
equal to the IPv6 address of egress PE. | equal to the IPv6 address of egress PE. | |||
7. Implementation Status | 7. Error Handling | |||
[Note to RFC Editor: This section needs to be removed before | ||||
publication as RFC.] | ||||
The [I-D.matsushima-spring-srv6-deployment-status] describes the | ||||
current deployment and implementation status of SRv6 which also | ||||
includes the BGP services over SRv6 as specified in this document. | ||||
8. Error Handling | ||||
In case of any errors encountered while processing SRv6 Service TLVs, | In case of any errors encountered while processing SRv6 Service TLVs, | |||
the details of the error SHOULD be logged for further analysis. | the details of the error SHOULD be logged for further analysis. | |||
If multiple instances of SRv6 L3 Service TLV are encountered, all but | If multiple instances of the SRv6 L3 Service TLV are encountered, all | |||
the first instance MUST be ignored. | but the first instance MUST be ignored. | |||
If multiple instances of SRv6 L2 Service TLV are encountered, all but | If multiple instances of the SRv6 L2 Service TLV are encountered, all | |||
the first instance MUST be ignored. | but the first instance MUST be ignored. | |||
An SRv6 Service TLV is considered malformed in the following cases: | An SRv6 Service TLV is considered malformed in the following cases: | |||
o the TLV Length is less than 1 | * The TLV Length is less than 1. | |||
o the TLV Length is inconsistent with the length of BGP Prefix-SID | * The TLV Length is inconsistent with the length of the BGP Prefix- | |||
attribute | SID attribute. | |||
o at least one of the constituent Sub-TLVs is malformed | * At least one of the constituent Sub-TLVs is malformed. | |||
An SRv6 Service Sub-TLV is considered malformed in the following | An SRv6 Service Sub-TLV is considered malformed in the following | |||
cases: | case: | |||
o the Sub-TLV Length is inconsistent with the length of the | * The Sub-TLV Length is inconsistent with the length of the | |||
enclosing SRv6 Service TLV | enclosing SRv6 Service TLV. | |||
An SRv6 SID Information Sub-TLV is considered malformed in the | An SRv6 SID Information Sub-TLV is considered malformed in the | |||
following cases: | following cases: | |||
* the Sub-TLV Length is less than 21 | * The Sub-TLV Length is less than 21. | |||
* the Sub-TLV Length is inconsistent with the length of the | ||||
enclosing SRv6 Service TLV | ||||
* at least one of the constituent Sub-Sub-TLVs is malformed | * The Sub-TLV Length is inconsistent with the length of the | |||
enclosing SRv6 Service TLV. | ||||
* At least one of the constituent Sub-Sub-TLVs is malformed. | ||||
An SRv6 Service Data Sub-Sub-TLV is considered malformed in the | An SRv6 Service Data Sub-Sub-TLV is considered malformed in the | |||
following cases: | following case: | |||
o the Sub-Sub-TLV Length is inconsistent with the length of the | * The Sub-Sub-TLV Length is inconsistent with the length of the | |||
enclosing SRv6 service Sub-TLV | enclosing SRv6 service Sub-TLV. | |||
Any TLV or Sub-TLV or Sub-Sub-TLV is not considered malformed because | Any TLV, Sub-TLV, or Sub-Sub-TLV is not considered malformed because | |||
its Type is unrecognized. | its Type is unrecognized. | |||
Any TLV or Sub-TLV or Sub-Sub-TLV is not considered malformed because | Any TLV, Sub-TLV, or Sub-Sub-TLV is not considered malformed because | |||
of failing any semantic validation of its Value field. | of failing any semantic validation of its Value field. | |||
SRv6 overlay service requires Service SID for forwarding. The treat- | The SRv6 overlay service requires the Service SID for forwarding. | |||
as-withdraw action [RFC7606] MUST be performed when at least one | The treat-as-withdraw action [RFC7606] MUST be performed when at | |||
malformed SRV6 Service TLV is present in the BGP Prefix-SID | least one malformed SRv6 Service TLV is present in the BGP Prefix-SID | |||
attribute. | attribute. | |||
SRv6 SID value in SRv6 SID Information Sub-TLV is invalid when SID | The SRv6 SID value in the SRv6 SID Information Sub-TLV is invalid | |||
Structure Sub-Sub-TLV transposition length is greater than the number | when the SID Structure Sub-Sub-TLV transposition length is greater | |||
of bits of the label field or if any of the conditions for the fields | than the number of bits of the label field or if any of the | |||
of the sub-sub-TLV as specified in Section 3.2.1 is not met. The | conditions for the fields of the Sub-Sub-TLV, as specified in | |||
transposition offset and length MUST be 0 when the Sub-Sub-TLV is | Section 3.2.1, is not met. The transposition offset and length MUST | |||
advertised along with routes where transposition scheme is not | be 0 when the Sub-Sub-TLV is advertised along with routes where the | |||
applicable (e.g., for Global IPv6 Service [RFC2545] where there is no | transposition scheme is not applicable (e.g., for global IPv6 service | |||
label field). The path having such Prefix-SID Attribute without any | [RFC2545] where there is no label field). The path having any such | |||
valid SRv6 SID information MUST be considered ineligible during the | Prefix-SID attribute without any valid SRv6 SID information MUST be | |||
selection of the best path for the corresponding prefix. | considered ineligible during the selection of the best path for the | |||
corresponding prefix. | ||||
9. IANA Considerations | 8. IANA Considerations | |||
9.1. BGP Prefix-SID TLV Types Registry | 8.1. BGP Prefix-SID TLV Types Registry | |||
This document introduces two new TLV Types of the BGP Prefix-SID | This document introduces two new TLV Types of the BGP Prefix-SID | |||
attribute. IANA has assigned Type values in the registry "BGP | attribute. IANA has assigned Type values in the "BGP Prefix-SID TLV | |||
Prefix-SID TLV Types" as follows: | Types" subregistry as follows: | |||
Value Type Reference | +=======+=====================+===========+ | |||
-------------------------------------------- | | Value | Type | Reference | | |||
4 Deprecated <this document> | +=======+=====================+===========+ | |||
5 SRv6 L3 Service TLV <this document> | | 4 | Deprecated | RFC 9252 | | |||
6 SRv6 L2 Service TLV <this document> | +-------+---------------------+-----------+ | |||
| 5 | SRv6 L3 Service TLV | RFC 9252 | | ||||
+-------+---------------------+-----------+ | ||||
| 6 | SRv6 L2 Service TLV | RFC 9252 | | ||||
+-------+---------------------+-----------+ | ||||
Figure 12: BGP Prefix-SID TLV Types | Table 1: BGP Prefix-SID TLV Types | |||
Subregistry | ||||
The value 4 previously corresponded to the SRv6-VPN SID TLV, which | Value 4 previously corresponded to the SRv6-VPN SID TLV, which was | |||
was specified in previous versions of this document and used by early | specified in earlier draft versions of this document and used by | |||
implementations of this specification. It was deprecated and | early implementations of this specification. It was deprecated and | |||
replaced by the SRv6 L3 Service and SRv6 L2 Service TLVs. | replaced by the SRv6 L3 Service and SRv6 L2 Service TLVs. | |||
9.2. SRv6 Service Sub-TLV Types Registry | 8.2. SRv6 Service Sub-TLV Types Registry | |||
IANA is requested to create and maintain a new registry called "SRv6 | IANA has created and now maintains a new subregistry called "SRv6 | |||
Service Sub-TLV Types" under the "Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) | Service Sub-TLV Types" under the "Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) | |||
Parameters" registry. The allocation policy for this registry is: | Parameters" registry. The registration procedures, per [RFC8126], | |||
for this subregistry are according to Table 2. | ||||
0 : Reserved | +=========+=========================+ | |||
1-127 : IETF Review | | Range | Registration Procedure | | |||
128-254 : First Come First Served | +=========+=========================+ | |||
255 : Reserved | | 1-127 | IETF Review | | |||
+---------+-------------------------+ | ||||
| 128-254 | First Come First Served | | ||||
+---------+-------------------------+ | ||||
| 255 | IETF Review | | ||||
+---------+-------------------------+ | ||||
Figure 13: SRv6 Service Sub-TLV Types Allocation Policy | Table 2: SRv6 Service Sub-TLV | |||
Types Subregistry Registration | ||||
Procedures | ||||
The following Sub-TLV Type is defined in this document: | IANA has populated this subregistry as follows. Note that the SRv6 | |||
SID Information Sub-TLV is defined in this document: | ||||
Value Type Reference | +=======+==============================+===========+ | |||
---------------------------------------------------- | | Value | Type | Reference | | |||
1 SRv6 SID Information Sub-TLV <this document> | +=======+==============================+===========+ | |||
| 0 | Reserved | RFC 9252 | | ||||
+-------+------------------------------+-----------+ | ||||
| 1 | SRv6 SID Information Sub-TLV | RFC 9252 | | ||||
+-------+------------------------------+-----------+ | ||||
| 255 | Reserved | RFC 9252 | | ||||
+-------+------------------------------+-----------+ | ||||
Figure 14: SRv6 Service Sub-TLV Types | Table 3: SRv6 Service Sub-TLV Types Subregistry | |||
Initial Contents | ||||
9.3. SRv6 Service Data Sub-Sub-TLV Types Registry | 8.3. SRv6 Service Data Sub-Sub-TLV Types Registry | |||
IANA is requested to create and maintain a new registry called "SRv6 | IANA has created and now maintains a new subregistry called "SRv6 | |||
Service Data Sub-Sub-TLV Types" under the "Border Gateway Protocol | Service Data Sub-Sub-TLV Types" under the "Border Gateway Protocol | |||
(BGP) Parameters" registry. The allocation policy for this registry | (BGP) Parameters" registry. The registration procedures for this | |||
is: | subregistry are according to Table 4. | |||
0 : Reserved | +=========+=========================+ | |||
1-127 : IETF Review | | Range | Registration Procedure | | |||
128-254 : First Come First Served | +=========+=========================+ | |||
255 : Reserved | | 1-127 | IETF Review | | |||
+---------+-------------------------+ | ||||
| 128-254 | First Come First Served | | ||||
+---------+-------------------------+ | ||||
| 255 | IETF Review | | ||||
+---------+-------------------------+ | ||||
Figure 15: SRv6 Service Data Sub-Sub-TLV Types Allocation Policy | Table 4: SRv6 Service Data Sub- | |||
Sub-TLV Types Subregistry | ||||
Registration Procedures | ||||
The following Sub-Sub-TLV Type is defined in this document: | The following Sub-Sub-TLV Type is defined in this document: | |||
Value Type Reference | +=======+================================+===========+ | |||
---------------------------------------------------- | | Value | Type | Reference | | |||
1 SRv6 SID Structure Sub-Sub-TLV <this document> | +=======+================================+===========+ | |||
| 0 | Reserved | RFC 9252 | | ||||
+-------+--------------------------------+-----------+ | ||||
| 1 | SRv6 SID Structure Sub-Sub-TLV | RFC 9252 | | ||||
+-------+--------------------------------+-----------+ | ||||
| 255 | Reserved | RFC 9252 | | ||||
+-------+--------------------------------+-----------+ | ||||
Figure 16: SRv6 Service Data Sub-Sub-TLV Types | Table 5: SRv6 Service Data Sub-Sub-TLV Types | |||
Subregistry Initial Contents | ||||
9.4. BGP SRv6 Service SID Flags Registry | 8.4. BGP SRv6 Service SID Flags Registry | |||
IANA is requested to create and maintain a new registry called "BGP | IANA has created and now maintains a new subregistry called "BGP SRv6 | |||
SRv6 Service SID Flags" under the "Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) | Service SID Flags" under the "Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) | |||
Parameters" registry. The allocation policy for this registry is | Parameters" registry. The registration procedure for this | |||
IETF Review and all 8 bit positions of the flags are currently | subregistry is IETF Review, and all 8-bit positions of the flags are | |||
unassigned. | currently unassigned. | |||
9.5. Subsequent Address Family Identifiers (SAFI) Parameters Registry | 8.5. SAFI Values Registry | |||
IANA is requested to add this document as a reference for value 128 | IANA has added this document as a reference for value 128 ("MPLS- | |||
in the "Subsequent Address Family Identifiers (SAFI) Parameters" | labeled VPN address") in the "SAFI Values" subregistry under the | |||
registry. | "Subsequent Address Family Identifiers (SAFI) Parameters" registry. | |||
10. Security Considerations | 9. Security Considerations | |||
This document specifies extensions to the BGP protocol for signaling | This document specifies extensions to the BGP protocol for the | |||
of services for SRv6. These specifications leverage existing BGP | signaling of services for SRv6. These specifications leverage | |||
protocol mechanisms for the signaling of various types of services. | existing BGP protocol mechanisms for the signaling of various types | |||
It also builds upon existing elements of the SR architecture (more | of services. It also builds upon existing elements of the SR | |||
specifically SRv6). As such, this section largely provides pointers | architecture (more specifically, SRv6). As such, this section | |||
(as a reminder) to the security considerations of those existing | largely provides pointers (as a reminder) to the security | |||
specifications while also covering certain newer security aspects for | considerations of those existing specifications while also covering | |||
the specifications newly introduced by this document. | certain, newer security aspects for the specifications newly | |||
introduced by this document. | ||||
10.1. BGP Session Related Considerations | 9.1. Considerations Related to BGP Sessions | |||
Techniques related to authentication of BGP sessions for securing | Techniques related to authentication of BGP sessions for securing | |||
messages between BGP peers as discussed in the BGP specification | messages between BGP peers, as discussed in the BGP specification | |||
[RFC4271] and, in the security analysis for BGP [RFC4272] apply. The | [RFC4271] and in the security analysis for BGP [RFC4272], apply. The | |||
discussion of the use of the TCP Authentication option to protect BGP | discussion of the use of the TCP Authentication Option to protect BGP | |||
sessions is found in [RFC5925], while [RFC6952] includes an analysis | sessions is found in [RFC5925], while [RFC6952] includes an analysis | |||
of BGP keying and authentication issues. This document does not | of BGP keying and authentication issues. This document does not | |||
introduce any additional BGP session security considerations. | introduce any additional BGP session security considerations. | |||
10.2. BGP Services Related Considerations | 9.2. Considerations Related to BGP Services | |||
This document does not introduce new services or BGP NLRI types but | This document does not introduce new services or BGP NLRI types but | |||
extends the signaling of existing ones for SRv6. Therefore, the | extends the signaling of existing ones for SRv6. Therefore, the | |||
security considerations for the respective BGP services BGP IPv4 over | security considerations for the respective BGP services, such as BGP | |||
IPv6 NH [RFC8950], BGP IPv6 L3VPN [RFC4659], BGP IPv6 [RFC2545], BGP | IPv4 over IPv6 NH [RFC8950], BGP IPv6 L3VPN [RFC4659], BGP IPv6 | |||
EVPN [RFC7432] and IP EVPN [RFC9136] apply as discussed in their | [RFC2545], BGP EVPN [RFC7432], and IP EVPN [RFC9136], apply as | |||
respective documents. [RFC8669] discusses mechanisms to prevent | discussed in their respective documents. [RFC8669] discusses | |||
leaking of BGP Prefix-SID attribute, that carries SR information, | mechanisms to prevent the leaking of the BGP Prefix-SID attribute, | |||
outside the SR domain. | which carries SR information, outside the SR domain. | |||
As a reminder, several of the BGP services (i.e., the AFI/SAFI used | As a reminder, several of the BGP services (i.e., the AFI/SAFI used | |||
for their signaling) were initially introduced for one encapsulation | for their signaling) were initially introduced for one encapsulation | |||
mechanism and later extended for others e.g., EVPN MPLS [RFC7432] was | mechanism and later extended for others, e.g., EVPN MPLS [RFC7432] | |||
extended for VXLAN/NVGRE encapsulation [RFC8365]. [RFC9012] enables | was extended for Virtual eXtensible Local Area Network (VXLAN) | |||
the use of various IP encapsulation mechanisms along with different | encapsulation and Network Virtualization Using Generic Routing | |||
BGP SAFIs for their respective services. The existing filtering | Encapsulation (NVGRE) [RFC8365]. [RFC9012] enables the use of | |||
mechanisms for preventing the leak of the encapsulation information | various IP encapsulation mechanisms along with different BGP SAFIs | |||
(carried in BGP attributes) and to prevent the advertisement of | for their respective services. The existing filtering mechanisms for | |||
prefixes from the provider's internal address space (especially the | preventing the leak of the encapsulation information (carried in BGP | |||
SRv6 Block as discussed in [RFC8986]) to external peers (or into the | attributes) and preventing the advertisement of prefixes from the | |||
Internet) also apply in the case of SRv6. | provider's internal address space (especially the SRv6 Block, as | |||
discussed in [RFC8986]) to external peers (or into the Internet) also | ||||
apply in the case of SRv6. | ||||
Specific to SRv6, a misconfig or error in the above mentioned BGP | Specific to SRv6, a misconfiguration or error in the BGP filtering | |||
filtering mechanisms may result in exposing information such as SRv6 | mechanisms mentioned above may result in exposing information, such | |||
Service SIDs to external peers or other unauthorized entities. | as SRv6 Service SIDs to external peers or other unauthorized | |||
However, an attempt to exploit this information or to raise an attack | entities. However, an attempt to exploit this information or to | |||
by injecting packets into the network (e.g. customer networks in case | raise an attack by injecting packets into the network (e.g., customer | |||
of VPN services) is mitigated by the existing SRv6 data plane | networks in case of VPN services) is mitigated by the existing SRv6 | |||
security mechanisms as described in the next section. | data plane security mechanisms, as described in the next section. | |||
10.3. SR over IPv6 Data Plane Related Considerations | 9.3. Considerations Related to SR over IPv6 Data Plane | |||
This section provides a brief reminder and an overview of the | This section provides a brief reminder and an overview of the | |||
security considerations related to SRv6 with pointers to existing | security considerations related to SRv6 with pointers to existing | |||
specifications. This document introduces no new security | specifications. This document introduces no new security | |||
considerations of its own from the SRv6 data plane perspective. | considerations of its own from the SRv6 data plane perspective. | |||
SRv6 operates within a trusted SR domain. The data packets | SRv6 operates within a trusted SR domain. The data packets | |||
corresponding to service flows between PE routers are encapsulated | corresponding to service flows between PE routers are encapsulated | |||
(using SRv6 SIDs advertised via BGP) and carried within this trusted | (using SRv6 SIDs advertised via BGP) and carried within this trusted | |||
SR domain (e.g., within a single AS or between multiple ASes within a | SR domain (e.g., within a single AS or between multiple ASes within a | |||
single provider network). | single provider network). | |||
The security considerations of the Segment Routing architecture are | The security considerations of the SR architecture are covered by | |||
covered by [RFC8402]. More detailed security considerations | [RFC8402]. More detailed security considerations, specifically of | |||
specifically of SRv6 and SRH are covered by [RFC8754] as they relate | SRv6 and SRH, are covered by [RFC8754] as they relate to SR Attacks | |||
to SR Attacks (section 7.1), Service Theft (section 7.2) and Topology | (Section 7.1), Service Theft (Section 7.2), and Topology Disclosure | |||
Disclosure (section 7.3). As such an operator deploying SRv6 MUST | (Section 7.3). As such, an operator deploying SRv6 MUST follow the | |||
follow the considerations described in [RFC8754] section 7 to | considerations described in Section 7 of [RFC8754] to implement the | |||
implement the infrastructure ACLs, BCP 38 [RFC2827] and BCP 84 | infrastructure Access Control Lists (ACLs) and the recommendations | |||
[RFC3704] recommendations. | described in BCP 38 [RFC2827] and BCP 84 [RFC3704]. | |||
The SRv6 deployment and SID allocation guidelines as described in | The SRv6 deployment and SID allocation guidelines, as described in | |||
[RFC8986] simplify the deployment of the ACL filters (e.g., a single | [RFC8986], simplify the deployment of the ACL filters (e.g., a single | |||
ACL corresponding to the SRv6 Block applied to the external | ACL corresponding to the SRv6 Block applied to the external | |||
interfaces on border nodes is sufficient to block packets destined to | interfaces on border nodes is sufficient to block packets destined to | |||
any SRv6 SID in the domain from external/unauthorized networks). | any SRv6 SID in the domain from external/unauthorized networks). | |||
While there is an assumed trust model within a SR domain such that | While there is an assumed trust model within an SR domain, such that | |||
any node sending packet to an SRv6 SID is assumed to be allowed to do | any node sending a packet to an SRv6 SID is assumed to be allowed to | |||
so, there is also the option of using SRH HMAC TLV [RFC8754] as | do so, there is also the option of using an SRH Hashed Message | |||
described in [RFC8986] for validation. | Authentication Code (HMAC) TLV [RFC8754], as described in [RFC8986], | |||
for validation. | ||||
The SRv6 SID Endpoint behaviors implementing the services signalled | The SRv6 SID Endpoint behaviors implementing the services signaled in | |||
in this document are defined in [RFC8986] and hence the security | this document are defined in [RFC8986]; hence, the security | |||
considerations of that document apply. These considerations are | considerations of that document apply. These considerations are | |||
independent of the protocol used for service deployment, i.e. | independent of the protocol used for service deployment, i.e., | |||
independent of BGP signaling of SRv6 services. | independent of BGP signaling of SRv6 services. | |||
These considerations help protect transit traffic as well as | These considerations help protect transit traffic as well as | |||
services, such as VPNs, to avoid service theft or injection of | services, such as VPNs, to avoid service theft or injection of | |||
traffic into customer VPN. | traffic into customer VPNs. | |||
11. Acknowledgments | ||||
The authors of this document would like to thank Stephane Litkowski, | ||||
Rishabh Parekh, Xiejingrong, Rajesh M, Mustapha Aissaoui, Alexander | ||||
Vainshtein, Eduard Metz, Shraddha Hegde, Eduard Vasilenko, Ron | ||||
Bonica, and Joel Halpern for their comments and review of this | ||||
document. The authors would also like to thank Matthew Bocci for his | ||||
document shepherd review and Martin Vigoureux for his AD review that | ||||
resulted in helpful comments for improving this document. | ||||
12. Contributors | ||||
Clarence Filsfils | ||||
Cisco | ||||
Email: cfilsfil@cisco.com | ||||
Satoru Matsushima | ||||
SoftBank | ||||
Email: satoru.matsushima@g.softbank.co.jp | ||||
Dirk Steinberg | ||||
Steinberg Consulting | ||||
Email: dirk@lapishills.com | ||||
Daniel Bernier | ||||
Bell Canada | ||||
Email: daniel.bernier@bell.ca | ||||
Daniel Voyer | ||||
Bell Canada | ||||
Email: daniel.voyer@bell.ca | ||||
Jonn Leddy | ||||
Individual | ||||
Email: john@leddy.net | ||||
Swadesh Agrawal | ||||
Cisco | ||||
Email: swaagraw@cisco.com | ||||
Patrice Brissette | ||||
Cisco | ||||
Email: pbrisset@cisco.com | ||||
Ali Sajassi | ||||
Cisco | ||||
Email: sajassi@cisco.com | ||||
Bart Peirens | ||||
Proximus | ||||
Belgium | ||||
Email: bart.peirens@proximus.com | ||||
Darren Dukes | ||||
Cisco | ||||
Email: ddukes@cisco.com | ||||
Pablo Camarilo | ||||
Cisco | ||||
Email: pcamaril@cisco.com | ||||
Shyam Sethuram | ||||
Cisco | ||||
Email: shyam.ioml@gmail.com | ||||
Zafar Ali | ||||
Cisco | ||||
Email: zali@cisco.com | ||||
13. References | ||||
13.1. Normative References | 10. References | |||
[I-D.ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy] | 10.1. Normative References | |||
Sajassi, A., Thoria, S., Mishra, M., Drake, J., and W. | ||||
Lin, "IGMP and MLD Proxy for EVPN", draft-ietf-bess-evpn- | ||||
igmp-mld-proxy-20 (work in progress), March 2022. | ||||
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate | [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate | |||
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, | Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, | |||
DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997, | DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997, | |||
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>. | <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>. | |||
[RFC2545] Marques, P. and F. Dupont, "Use of BGP-4 Multiprotocol | [RFC2545] Marques, P. and F. Dupont, "Use of BGP-4 Multiprotocol | |||
Extensions for IPv6 Inter-Domain Routing", RFC 2545, | Extensions for IPv6 Inter-Domain Routing", RFC 2545, | |||
DOI 10.17487/RFC2545, March 1999, | DOI 10.17487/RFC2545, March 1999, | |||
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2545>. | <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2545>. | |||
skipping to change at page 32, line 38 ¶ | skipping to change at line 1432 ¶ | |||
D., Matsushima, S., and Z. Li, "Segment Routing over IPv6 | D., Matsushima, S., and Z. Li, "Segment Routing over IPv6 | |||
(SRv6) Network Programming", RFC 8986, | (SRv6) Network Programming", RFC 8986, | |||
DOI 10.17487/RFC8986, February 2021, | DOI 10.17487/RFC8986, February 2021, | |||
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8986>. | <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8986>. | |||
[RFC9136] Rabadan, J., Ed., Henderickx, W., Drake, J., Lin, W., and | [RFC9136] Rabadan, J., Ed., Henderickx, W., Drake, J., Lin, W., and | |||
A. Sajassi, "IP Prefix Advertisement in Ethernet VPN | A. Sajassi, "IP Prefix Advertisement in Ethernet VPN | |||
(EVPN)", RFC 9136, DOI 10.17487/RFC9136, October 2021, | (EVPN)", RFC 9136, DOI 10.17487/RFC9136, October 2021, | |||
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9136>. | <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9136>. | |||
13.2. Informative References | [RFC9251] Sajassi, A., Thoria, S., Mishra, M., Patel, K., Drake, J., | |||
and W. Lin, "Internet Group Management Protocol (IGMP) and | ||||
Multicast Listener Discovery (MLD) Proxies for Ethernet | ||||
VPN (EVPN)", RFC RFC9251, DOI 10.17487/RFC9251, June 2022, | ||||
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9251>. | ||||
[I-D.ietf-idr-segment-routing-te-policy] | 10.2. Informative References | |||
Previdi, S., Filsfils, C., Talaulikar, K., Mattes, P., | ||||
Jain, D., and S. Lin, "Advertising Segment Routing | ||||
Policies in BGP", draft-ietf-idr-segment-routing-te- | ||||
policy-16 (work in progress), March 2022. | ||||
[I-D.ietf-lsr-flex-algo] | [IDR-SEGMENT-ROUTING-TE-POLICY] | |||
Psenak, P., Hegde, S., Filsfils, C., Talaulikar, K., and | Previdi, S., Filsfils, C., Talaulikar, K., Ed., Mattes, | |||
A. Gulko, "IGP Flexible Algorithm", draft-ietf-lsr-flex- | P., Jain, D., and S. Lin, "Advertising Segment Routing | |||
algo-18 (work in progress), October 2021. | Policies in BGP", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft- | |||
ietf-idr-segment-routing-te-policy-17, 14 April 2022, | ||||
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-idr- | ||||
segment-routing-te-policy-17>. | ||||
[I-D.ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy] | [IGMP-MLD-EVPN] | |||
Filsfils, C., Talaulikar, K., Voyer, D., Bogdanov, A., and | Filsfils, C., Talaulikar, K., Ed., Voyer, D., Bogdanov, | |||
P. Mattes, "Segment Routing Policy Architecture", draft- | A., and P. Mattes, "Segment Routing Policy Architecture", | |||
ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy-21 (work in progress), | Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-spring- | |||
March 2022. | segment-routing-policy-22, 22 March 2022, | |||
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-spring- | ||||
segment-routing-policy-22>. | ||||
[I-D.matsushima-spring-srv6-deployment-status] | [LSR-FLEX-ALGO] | |||
Matsushima, S., Filsfils, C., Ali, Z., Li, Z., Rajaraman, | Psenak, P., Ed., Hegde, S., Filsfils, C., Talaulikar, K., | |||
K., and A. Dhamija, "SRv6 Implementation and Deployment | and A. Gulko, "IGP Flexible Algorithm", Work in Progress, | |||
Status", draft-matsushima-spring-srv6-deployment-status-13 | Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-20, 18 May 2022, | |||
(work in progress), March 2022. | <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-lsr- | |||
flex-algo-20>. | ||||
[RFC2827] Ferguson, P. and D. Senie, "Network Ingress Filtering: | [RFC2827] Ferguson, P. and D. Senie, "Network Ingress Filtering: | |||
Defeating Denial of Service Attacks which employ IP Source | Defeating Denial of Service Attacks which employ IP Source | |||
Address Spoofing", BCP 38, RFC 2827, DOI 10.17487/RFC2827, | Address Spoofing", BCP 38, RFC 2827, DOI 10.17487/RFC2827, | |||
May 2000, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2827>. | May 2000, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2827>. | |||
[RFC3704] Baker, F. and P. Savola, "Ingress Filtering for Multihomed | [RFC3704] Baker, F. and P. Savola, "Ingress Filtering for Multihomed | |||
Networks", BCP 84, RFC 3704, DOI 10.17487/RFC3704, March | Networks", BCP 84, RFC 3704, DOI 10.17487/RFC3704, March | |||
2004, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3704>. | 2004, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3704>. | |||
skipping to change at page 33, line 44 ¶ | skipping to change at line 1490 ¶ | |||
[RFC6513] Rosen, E., Ed. and R. Aggarwal, Ed., "Multicast in MPLS/ | [RFC6513] Rosen, E., Ed. and R. Aggarwal, Ed., "Multicast in MPLS/ | |||
BGP IP VPNs", RFC 6513, DOI 10.17487/RFC6513, February | BGP IP VPNs", RFC 6513, DOI 10.17487/RFC6513, February | |||
2012, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6513>. | 2012, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6513>. | |||
[RFC6952] Jethanandani, M., Patel, K., and L. Zheng, "Analysis of | [RFC6952] Jethanandani, M., Patel, K., and L. Zheng, "Analysis of | |||
BGP, LDP, PCEP, and MSDP Issues According to the Keying | BGP, LDP, PCEP, and MSDP Issues According to the Keying | |||
and Authentication for Routing Protocols (KARP) Design | and Authentication for Routing Protocols (KARP) Design | |||
Guide", RFC 6952, DOI 10.17487/RFC6952, May 2013, | Guide", RFC 6952, DOI 10.17487/RFC6952, May 2013, | |||
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6952>. | <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6952>. | |||
[RFC8126] Cotton, M., Leiba, B., and T. Narten, "Guidelines for | ||||
Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26, | ||||
RFC 8126, DOI 10.17487/RFC8126, June 2017, | ||||
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8126>. | ||||
[RFC9012] Patel, K., Van de Velde, G., Sangli, S., and J. Scudder, | [RFC9012] Patel, K., Van de Velde, G., Sangli, S., and J. Scudder, | |||
"The BGP Tunnel Encapsulation Attribute", RFC 9012, | "The BGP Tunnel Encapsulation Attribute", RFC 9012, | |||
DOI 10.17487/RFC9012, April 2021, | DOI 10.17487/RFC9012, April 2021, | |||
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9012>. | <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9012>. | |||
Acknowledgements | ||||
The authors of this document would like to thank Stephane Litkowski, | ||||
Rishabh Parekh, Xiejingrong, Rajesh M., Mustapha Aissaoui, Alexander | ||||
Vainshtein, Eduard Metz, Shraddha Hegde, Eduard Vasilenko, Ron | ||||
Bonica, and Joel Halpern for their comments and review of this | ||||
document. The authors would also like to thank Document Shepherd | ||||
Matthew Bocci for his review and AD Martin Vigoureux for his review | ||||
that resulted in helpful comments for improving this document. | ||||
Contributors | ||||
Clarence Filsfils | ||||
Cisco | ||||
Email: cfilsfil@cisco.com | ||||
Satoru Matsushima | ||||
SoftBank | ||||
Email: satoru.matsushima@g.softbank.co.jp | ||||
Dirk Steinberg | ||||
Steinberg Consulting | ||||
Email: dirk@lapishills.com | ||||
Daniel Bernier | ||||
Bell Canada | ||||
Email: daniel.bernier@bell.ca | ||||
Daniel Voyer | ||||
Bell Canada | ||||
Email: daniel.voyer@bell.ca | ||||
Jonn Leddy | ||||
Individual | ||||
Email: john@leddy.net | ||||
Swadesh Agrawal | ||||
Cisco | ||||
Email: swaagraw@cisco.com | ||||
Patrice Brissette | ||||
Cisco | ||||
Email: pbrisset@cisco.com | ||||
Ali Sajassi | ||||
Cisco | ||||
Email: sajassi@cisco.com | ||||
Bart Peirens | ||||
Proximus | ||||
Belgium | ||||
Email: bart.peirens@proximus.com | ||||
Darren Dukes | ||||
Cisco | ||||
Email: ddukes@cisco.com | ||||
Pablo Camarilo | ||||
Cisco | ||||
Email: pcamaril@cisco.com | ||||
Shyam Sethuram | ||||
Cisco | ||||
Email: shyam.ioml@gmail.com | ||||
Zafar Ali | ||||
Cisco | ||||
Email: zali@cisco.com | ||||
Authors' Addresses | Authors' Addresses | |||
Gaurav Dawra (editor) | Gaurav Dawra (editor) | |||
USA | United States of America | |||
Email: gdawra.ietf@gmail.com | Email: gdawra.ietf@gmail.com | |||
Ketan Talaulikar (editor) | Ketan Talaulikar (editor) | |||
Cisco Systems | Cisco Systems | |||
India | India | |||
Email: ketant.ietf@gmail.com | Email: ketant.ietf@gmail.com | |||
Robert Raszuk | Robert Raszuk | |||
NTT Network Innovations | NTT Network Innovations | |||
940 Stewart Dr | 940 Stewart Dr. | |||
Sunnyvale, CA 94085 | Sunnyvale, CA 94085 | |||
USA | United States of America | |||
Email: robert@raszuk.net | Email: robert@raszuk.net | |||
Bruno Decraene | Bruno Decraene | |||
Orange | Orange | |||
France | France | |||
Email: bruno.decraene@orange.com | Email: bruno.decraene@orange.com | |||
Shunwan Zhuang | Shunwan Zhuang | |||
Huawei Technologies | Huawei Technologies | |||
China | China | |||
Email: zhuangshunwan@huawei.com | Email: zhuangshunwan@huawei.com | |||
Jorge Rabadan | Jorge Rabadan | |||
Nokia | Nokia | |||
USA | United States of America | |||
Email: jorge.rabadan@nokia.com | Email: jorge.rabadan@nokia.com | |||
End of changes. 242 change blocks. | ||||
850 lines changed or deleted | 898 lines changed or added | |||
This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.48. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/ |